IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i10p6273-d820968.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Post-Operative Patients’ Satisfaction and Quality of Life Assessment in Adult Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome (OSAS)

Author

Listed:
  • Diego Sergio Rossi

    (Dental and Maxillo-Facial Surgery Unit, IRCCS Ca Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico di Milano, Via Francesco Sforza 35, 20122 Milan, Italy)

  • Funda Goker

    (Department of Biomedical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy)

  • Federico Cullati

    (Dental and Maxillo-Facial Surgery Unit, IRCCS Ca Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico di Milano, Via Francesco Sforza 35, 20122 Milan, Italy)

  • Alessandro Baj

    (Dental and Maxillo-Facial Surgery Unit, IRCCS Ca Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico di Milano, Via Francesco Sforza 35, 20122 Milan, Italy
    Department of Biomedical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy)

  • Daniele Pignatelli

    (School of Medicine, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy)

  • Aldo Bruno Gianni

    (Dental and Maxillo-Facial Surgery Unit, IRCCS Ca Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico di Milano, Via Francesco Sforza 35, 20122 Milan, Italy
    Department of Biomedical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy)

  • Massimo Del Fabbro

    (Department of Biomedical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy
    IRCCS Orthopedic Institute Galeazzi, Via Riccardo Galeazzi 4, 20161 Milan, Italy)

Abstract

Background: The treatment for severe OSAS includes maxillomandibular advancement surgical option in selected cases. The aim of this study was to evaluate the post-operative impact of bimaxillary surgery on satisfaction and consequently the quality of life of these patients. Methods: This study included 18 patients with severe OSAS who received maxillomandibular advancement surgery. Patients were divided into Group A (operated by CAD/CAM) and Group B (conventional surgery). The impact of bimaxillary surgery on satisfaction and quality of life of these patients was evaluated by utilizing post-operative life quality and Rustemeyer’s patient-satisfaction-based survey. Results: A total of 18 adult OSAS patients (Group A: 11 patients, Group B: 7 patients) with a mean age of 44.39 years (SD ± 9.43) were included. Mean follow-up period was 32.64 months (SD ± 21.91). No intra-operative complications were seen in any patients. Post-operative complication was seen in one patient and the mandible did not integrate. According to the results, overall post-operative satisfaction score was 79.72% (SD ± 9.96). There was no significant difference among those in Group A and Group B. Conclusions: Maxillomandibular advancement surgery seems to be beneficial in terms of patients’ satisfaction in severe adult OSAS patients and can be considered as a valuable option in selected cases.

Suggested Citation

  • Diego Sergio Rossi & Funda Goker & Federico Cullati & Alessandro Baj & Daniele Pignatelli & Aldo Bruno Gianni & Massimo Del Fabbro, 2022. "Post-Operative Patients’ Satisfaction and Quality of Life Assessment in Adult Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome (OSAS)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(10), pages 1-18, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:10:p:6273-:d:820968
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/10/6273/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/10/6273/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:10:p:6273-:d:820968. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.