IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i10p6205-d819571.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Parental Mentalizing during Middle Childhood: How Is the Adoption of a Reflective Stance Associated with Child’s Psychological Outcomes?

Author

Listed:
  • Simone Charpentier Mora

    (Department of Educational Sciences, University of Genova, 16128 Genoa, Italy
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Chiara Bastianoni

    (Department of Educational Sciences, University of Genova, 16128 Genoa, Italy
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Nina Koren-Karie

    (The Center for the Study of Child Development, School of Social Work, University of Haifa, Haifa 3498838, Israel)

  • Donatella Cavanna

    (Department of Educational Sciences, University of Genova, 16128 Genoa, Italy)

  • Marta Tironi

    (Department of Educational Sciences, University of Genova, 16128 Genoa, Italy)

  • Fabiola Bizzi

    (Department of Educational Sciences, University of Genova, 16128 Genoa, Italy)

Abstract

This exploratory cross-sectional study attempts to understand the mechanisms underlying the role of parental mentalizing in a child’s psychological functioning during middle childhood by using Parental Reflective Functioning (PRF) and Parental Insightfulness (PI) constructs. The main aims are to examine the role of PI and PRF as processes capable of influencing a child’s psychological functioning in terms of emotional–behavioral difficulties and social–emotional competencies. Eighty-six community parents (48 mothers, 38 fathers) and their 50 children in middle childhood (Mage = 10.10, SD = 1.13) participated in this study, recruited through a non-probabilistic sampling. The following measures were used to assess the aims of this study: Insightfulness Assessment, Parental Reflective Functioning Questionnaire, Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) and Devereux Student Strengths Assessment (DESSA) questionnaires. Results showed that parental mentalizing was found to be significantly associated with both child’s internalizing and externalizing symptoms and social–emotional competencies as reported by parents through the CBCL and DESSA questionnaires. This study may offer a contribution to the study of parental mentalizing during middle childhood, supporting the hypothesis that both parents’ ability to understand their child’s mental states could affect the child’s psychological functioning. Clinical and theoretical implications are geared toward a family-based view with a specific focus on the importance of fostering in both parents a positive attitude toward mentalizing processes.

Suggested Citation

  • Simone Charpentier Mora & Chiara Bastianoni & Nina Koren-Karie & Donatella Cavanna & Marta Tironi & Fabiola Bizzi, 2022. "Parental Mentalizing during Middle Childhood: How Is the Adoption of a Reflective Stance Associated with Child’s Psychological Outcomes?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(10), pages 1-18, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:10:p:6205-:d:819571
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/10/6205/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/10/6205/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nicole Letourneau & Lubna Anis & Jason Novick & Carrie Pohl & Henry Ntanda & Martha Hart, 2023. "Impacts of the Attachment and Child Health (ATTACH TM ) Parenting Program on Mothers and Their Children at Risk of Maltreatment: Phase 2 Results," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-20, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:10:p:6205-:d:819571. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.