IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2021i1p96-d709102.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Use of Restorative Justice and Restorative Practices at School: A Systematic Literature Review

Author

Listed:
  • Ernesto Lodi

    (Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Sassari, 07100 Sassari, Italy)

  • Lucrezia Perrella

    (Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Sassari, 07100 Sassari, Italy)

  • Gian Luigi Lepri

    (Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Sassari, 07100 Sassari, Italy)

  • Maria Luisa Scarpa

    (Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Sassari, 07100 Sassari, Italy)

  • Patrizia Patrizi

    (Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Sassari, 07100 Sassari, Italy)

Abstract

Background: In recent years, the use of restorative justice (RJ) and restorative practices (RP) in schools has grown rapidly. Understanding how theory and research address this topic is important for its practical implementation based on scientific knowledge. The aim of this article was to analyse the practices derived from RJ implemented in school and what kinds of results have been achieved. Starting from the analysis of the qualitative and quantitative research in the field, a systematic review was conducted on the last decade of studies using RJ and RP at every level of school education. Methods: For this review, methods including the PRISMA guidelines, the PRISMA flow diagram, and qualitative synthesis were carried out. Scientific articles for the literature review were selected according to the following criteria: (1) publication date between the years 2010–2021; (2) student population aged 6–18 years; (3) publications in the English language; (4) articles directly accessible or accessible by contacting the author(s); 34 articles met the inclusion criteria. Results: The most used RP in school are circles ( n = 26), followed by restorative conferences ( n = 17), peer mediation ( n = 10), restorative conversations ( n = 8), mediation ( n = 7), community-building circles ( n = 5). RP can improve the school climate, discipline, positive conflict management through actions that aim at preventing suspensions, exclusions, conflicts, and misbehaviours (e.g., bullying). RJ practices promote positive relationships between peers and between students and teachers, as well as to prosocial behaviours through the development of social and emotional skills. Conclusions: From the studies examined, a great interest in applying restorative justice and practices in schools clearly emerged. Discussions on the benefits and challenges of implementation were provided. However, there is still limited evidence in terms of direct correlation, which suggests further studies on the impact of RJ and RP in school settings.

Suggested Citation

  • Ernesto Lodi & Lucrezia Perrella & Gian Luigi Lepri & Maria Luisa Scarpa & Patrizia Patrizi, 2021. "Use of Restorative Justice and Restorative Practices at School: A Systematic Literature Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-34, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2021:i:1:p:96-:d:709102
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/1/96/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/1/96/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2021:i:1:p:96-:d:709102. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.