IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2021i1p433-d715456.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Support for Health Insurance Coverage for Legal Abortion in the United States

Author

Listed:
  • Charley Henderson

    (Sociology Program, Texas Woman’s University, Denton, TX 76204, USA)

  • Philip Q. Yang

    (Sociology Program, Texas Woman’s University, Denton, TX 76204, USA)

Abstract

The use of health insurance to cover legal abortion is a controversial issue on which Americans are sharply divided. Currently, there is a lack of research on this issue as data became available only recently. Using data from the newly released General Social Survey in 2018, this study examines who is more or less likely to support health insurance coverage for legal abortion. The results show that the support and opposition were about evenly divided. The findings from the logistic regression analysis reveal that, holding other variables constant, Democrats, liberals, urban residents, the more educated, and the older were more likely to support health insurance coverage for legal abortion while women, Southerners, Christians, the currently married, and those with more children were less likely to favor it, compared to their respective counterparts. Additionally, the effect of education was stronger for liberals than for non-liberals. Race, family income, and full-time work status make no difference in the outcome. The findings have significant implications for research and practices in health insurance coverage for legal abortion.

Suggested Citation

  • Charley Henderson & Philip Q. Yang, 2021. "Support for Health Insurance Coverage for Legal Abortion in the United States," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-13, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2021:i:1:p:433-:d:715456
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/1/433/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/1/433/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2021:i:1:p:433-:d:715456. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.