IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2021i1p133-d709537.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Suggestion of Safety Certification Standards and Performance Evaluation Methods for Fabricated Mobile Scaffold in South Korea

Author

Listed:
  • Heesoo Kim

    (School of Civil, Environmental and Architectural Engineering, Korea University, Seoul 02841, Korea)

  • Jeonghyeon Lim

    (School of Civil, Environmental and Architectural Engineering, Korea University, Seoul 02841, Korea)

  • Jeong-Hun Won

    (Department of Safety Engineering, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Korea)

  • Jun-Hyuk Kwon

    (Temporary Equipment Certification Department, Occupational Safety & Health Certification Institute, Ulsan 44429, Korea)

  • Seungjun Kim

    (School of Civil, Environmental and Architectural Engineering, Korea University, Seoul 02841, Korea)

Abstract

At construction sites, various types of temporary equipment and structures are used for safety and work efficiency. However, various temporary equipment-related accidents frequently occur for many reasons, including inappropriate installation, usage, and material and structural imperfections. A mobile scaffold is one of the most commonly used indoor temporary equipment for work in high places. In general, the main structural members of the mobile scaffold, such as the mainframes, horizontal members, braces, caster wheels, outriggers, and handrails, are installed on the construction site for this purpose. This means that the load-carrying capacity of the equipment can vary depending on the assembly details. In Korea, there are safety certification standards applied for frequently used temporary equipment, such as scaffolds and shoring. However, the standards concern the strength criteria for the member itself, rather than the global load-carrying capacity. Therefore, it is difficult to review whether the fabricated mobile scaffold has sufficient load-carrying capacity, or to confirm the structural safety considering the various uncertainties affecting the structural performance. In this study, rational safety certification standards and evaluation methods are suggested for fabricated mobile scaffolds. The suggested safety certification standards present structure-level criteria for checking the load-carrying capacity, horizontal stiffness of the structure, and overturning risk. It is expected that the structural performance for safety can be directly checked based on the suggested safety certification standards and performance evaluation methods during the safety certification stage.

Suggested Citation

  • Heesoo Kim & Jeonghyeon Lim & Jeong-Hun Won & Jun-Hyuk Kwon & Seungjun Kim, 2021. "Suggestion of Safety Certification Standards and Performance Evaluation Methods for Fabricated Mobile Scaffold in South Korea," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-24, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2021:i:1:p:133-:d:709537
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/1/133/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/1/133/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2021:i:1:p:133-:d:709537. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.