IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i9p4891-d548698.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effectiveness of Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block after Elective Total Hip Replacement: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study

Author

Listed:
  • Wojciech Gola

    (Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Saint Lucas Hospital, Konskie 26-200, Poland
    Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Jan Kochanowski University, Kielce 25-369, Poland)

  • Szymon Bialka

    (Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, Department of Anaesthesiology, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice 40-055, Poland)

  • Aleksander J. Owczarek

    (Health Promotion and Obesity Management Unit, Department of Pathophysiology, Medical Faculty in Katowice, Medical University of Silesiain, Katowice 40-055, Poland)

  • Hanna Misiolek

    (Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, Department of Anaesthesiology, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice 40-055, Poland)

Abstract

Objective: An assessment of the feasibility of fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB) combined with nonopioid analgesics and patient controlled analgesia (PCA), oxycodone, in the perioperative anaesthetic management for elective total hip replacement (THR). Design: A randomised, single-center, open-label study. Setting: A single hospital. The study was conducted from October 2018 to May 2019. Participants: In total, 109 patients were scheduled for elective total hip replacement. Interventions: Postoperative FICB with 0.375% ropivacaine in conjunction with nonopioid analgesics (paracetamol, metamizole, and pregabalin) and oxycodone as rescue analgesia. Measurements: Pain intensity was measured using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NRS) at rest and during rehabilitation, the total dose of postoperative oxycodone required, the occurrence of opioid-related adverse events, patient hospitalisation time, and level of satisfaction. Follow-up period: 48 h. Main Results: A total of 109 patients were randomised into two groups and, of these, 9 were subsequently excluded from the analysis (three conversions to general anaesthesia, two failures to perform FICB, four failures to use the PCA pump). Patients in the FICB group received standard intravenous analgesia with FICB, and those in the control group were managed with standard intravenous analgesia only. Pain level measured with NRS was significantly lower at rest and during rehabilitation in the FICB group. Oxycodone use in the first 48 h was significantly higher in the control group ( p < 0.001); additionally, the time to the first dose of rescue analgesia was significantly shorter ( p < 0.001). In the control group, there was a higher rate of side effects and a significantly longer hospitalisation time ( p < 0.001). Similarly, higher satisfaction with the applied analgesic treatment was noted in the FICB group. Conclusions: FICB in elective THR treatments is an effective form of analgesia, which reduces the need for opioids, the number of complications, the length of hospitalisation, and which ensures a high level of patient satisfaction with the analgesic treatment used. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov No. NCT04690647.

Suggested Citation

  • Wojciech Gola & Szymon Bialka & Aleksander J. Owczarek & Hanna Misiolek, 2021. "Effectiveness of Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block after Elective Total Hip Replacement: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-12, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:9:p:4891-:d:548698
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/9/4891/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/9/4891/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:9:p:4891-:d:548698. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.