IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i8p4377-d539831.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mini-Implant-Retained Overdentures for the Rehabilitation of Completely Edentulous Maxillae: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Serena Vi

    (School of Medicine and Dentistry, Griffith University, Gold Coast 4222, Australia)

  • Damon Pham

    (School of Medicine and Dentistry, Griffith University, Gold Coast 4222, Australia)

  • Yu Yian Marina Du

    (School of Medicine and Dentistry, Griffith University, Gold Coast 4222, Australia)

  • Himanshu Arora

    (School of Dentistry, The University of Queensland, Brisbane 4006, Australia)

  • Santosh Kumar Tadakamadla

    (School of Medicine and Dentistry, Griffith University, Gold Coast 4222, Australia
    Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast 4222, Australia)

Abstract

Purpose: Mini-dental implants (MDIs) have been used to support and retain overdentures, providing patients with a less invasive placement procedure. Although lucrative, the use of MDIs to retain a maxillary overdenture is still not an established treatment modality. This systematic review aims to answer the question: Do mini-implant-retained maxillary overdentures provide a satisfactory treatment outcome for complete edentulism? Methods: A systematic search for relevant articles was conducted to include articles published until April 2021 in the following electronic databases: CINAHL, Cochrane, EMBASE, PubMed, and Web of Science. All empirical studies evaluating the biological, survival, or patient-reported outcomes after placing mini-implant-retained overdentures in maxilla were considered for inclusion. The risk of bias was assessed by utilizing the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal checklist. Study screening and data extraction were conducted by three reviewers independently. Results: The electronic search retrieved 1276 titles after omitting duplicates. Twenty articles were considered for full-text review, of which six studies were included in this systematic review. The included studies evaluated a total of 173 participants with a mean age of 66.3 years. The overall mini-implant survival rate was 77.1% (95% CI: 64.7–89.5%) with a mean follow-up time of 1.79 years (range: 6 months to 3 years). Implant survival differed significantly when comparing complete and partial palatal coverage overdentures. Those with complete palatal coverage exhibited less bone loss overall compared to partial coverage overdentures. Participants of all studies reported an increase in the quality of life and in satisfaction after rehabilitation treatment with MDIs. Conclusions: The survival rate of mini-implants retaining an overdenture in the maxilla was observed to be lower than the values reported for traditional implants in the literature. Improvements were observed in all aspects in terms of patient satisfaction, quality of life, oromyofunction, and articulation after the treatment.

Suggested Citation

  • Serena Vi & Damon Pham & Yu Yian Marina Du & Himanshu Arora & Santosh Kumar Tadakamadla, 2021. "Mini-Implant-Retained Overdentures for the Rehabilitation of Completely Edentulous Maxillae: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-15, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:8:p:4377-:d:539831
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/8/4377/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/8/4377/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wallace, Byron C. & Dahabreh, Issa J. & Trikalinos, Thomas A. & Lau, Joseph & Trow, Paul & Schmid, Christopher H., 2012. "Closing the Gap between Methodologists and End-Users: R as a Computational Back-End," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 49(i05).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shruti Murthy & Myron Anthony Godinho & Vasudeva Guddattu & Leslie Edward Simon Lewis & N Sreekumaran Nair, 2019. "Risk factors of neonatal sepsis in India: A systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(4), pages 1-26, April.
    2. Rami M Elshazli & Eman A Toraih & Abdelaziz Elgaml & Mohammed El-Mowafy & Mohamed El-Mesery & Mohamed N Amin & Mohammad H Hussein & Mary T Killackey & Manal S Fawzy & Emad Kandil, 2020. "Diagnostic and prognostic value of hematological and immunological markers in COVID-19 infection: A meta-analysis of 6320 patients," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(8), pages 1-20, August.
    3. Kai Wei Lee & Sook Fan Yap & Yun Fong Ngeow & Munn Sann Lye, 2021. "COVID-19 in People Living with HIV: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-25, March.
    4. Kai Wei Lee & Siew Mooi Ching & Navin Kumar Devaraj & Seng Choi Chong & Sook Yee Lim & Hong Chuan Loh & Habibah Abdul Hamid, 2020. "Diabetes in Pregnancy and Risk of Antepartum Depression: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-15, May.
    5. Clinton Sanchez & Brian Sundermeier & Kenneth Gray & Robert J Calin-Jageman, 2017. "Direct replication of Gervais & Norenzayan (2012): No evidence that analytic thinking decreases religious belief," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(2), pages 1-8, February.
    6. Vanja Dimitrijević & Tijana Šćepanović & Vukadin Milankov & Miroslav Milankov & Patrik Drid, 2022. "Effects of Corrective Exercises on Lumbar Lordotic Angle Correction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-12, April.
    7. Raluca Tomsa & Smaranda Gutu & Daniel Cojocaru & Belén Gutiérrez-Bermejo & Noelia Flores & Cristina Jenaro, 2021. "Prevalence of Sexual Abuse in Adults with Intellectual Disability: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-17, February.
    8. Valero-Mora, Pedro M. & Ledesma, Ruben, 2012. "Graphical User Interfaces for R," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 49(i01).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:8:p:4377-:d:539831. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.