IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i8p4094-d535323.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Tracking Technical Skill Development in Young Basketball Players: The INEX Study

Author

Listed:
  • Eduardo Guimarães

    (Centre of Research, Education, Innovation and Intervention in Sport (CIFI2D), Faculty of Sport, University of Porto, 4200-450 Porto, Portugal)

  • Adam D. G. Baxter-Jones

    (College of Kinesiology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5B2, Canada)

  • A. Mark Williams

    (Department of Health and Kinesiology, College of Health, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84108, USA)

  • Fernando Tavares

    (Centre of Research, Education, Innovation and Intervention in Sport (CIFI2D), Faculty of Sport, University of Porto, 4200-450 Porto, Portugal)

  • Manuel A. Janeira

    (Centre of Research, Education, Innovation and Intervention in Sport (CIFI2D), Faculty of Sport, University of Porto, 4200-450 Porto, Portugal)

  • José Maia

    (Centre of Research, Education, Innovation and Intervention in Sport (CIFI2D), Faculty of Sport, University of Porto, 4200-450 Porto, Portugal)

Abstract

This study investigated developmental stability, or tracking, in the development of technical skills in youth male basketball players and retrospectively profiled stable and unstable tracking patterns over time. A total of 97 basketball players were tracked bi-annually over 3 consecutive years. Players were divided into two age-categories according to their age at baseline: under-12; and under-14. Technical skills were assessed using the American Alliance for Health, Physical Education, Recreation and Dance test battery. Anthropometric, body composition, biological maturation and physical performance data were collected. Cohen’s kappa (κ) was used to estimate tracking. With the exception of defensive movement in the under-12 age-category, tracking was low in all skill tests for both under-12 (0.22 ≤ κ ≤ 0.33) and -14 (0.20 ≤ κ ≤ 0.26) groupings. The overall technical skill showed moderate tracking for under-12 players (κ = 0.47) and low tracking for under-14 players (κ = 0.26). At baseline, players who were consistently more skilled or became more skillful (in the under-12 age-category) over time had a better growth-motor performance profile and most of them were selected to be members of regional teams. In conclusion, tracking of individual skill trajectories was low-to-moderate. Moreover, a better growth-motor performance profile seems crucial to maintain high levels of skill performance over time. It is recommended that basketball coaches track the developmental trajectories of their players to better understand the erratic nature of skill development and help design more effective practice regimes.

Suggested Citation

  • Eduardo Guimarães & Adam D. G. Baxter-Jones & A. Mark Williams & Fernando Tavares & Manuel A. Janeira & José Maia, 2021. "Tracking Technical Skill Development in Young Basketball Players: The INEX Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-16, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:8:p:4094-:d:535323
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/8/4094/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/8/4094/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. José Bonal & Sergio Lorenzo Jiménez & Alberto Lorenzo, 2020. "The Talent Development Pathway for Elite Basketball Players in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-21, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:8:p:4094-:d:535323. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.