IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i8p3963-d533056.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Trends of Nursing Research on Accidental Falls: A Topic Modeling Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Yeji Seo

    (Department of Nursing, Chung-Ang University, 84 Heukseok-Ro Dongjak-Gu, Seoul 06974, Korea)

  • Kyunghee Kim

    (Department of Nursing, Chung-Ang University, 84 Heukseok-Ro Dongjak-Gu, Seoul 06974, Korea)

  • Ji-Su Kim

    (Department of Nursing, Chung-Ang University, 84 Heukseok-Ro Dongjak-Gu, Seoul 06974, Korea)

Abstract

This descriptive study analyzed 1849 international and 212 Korean studies to explore the main topics of nursing research on accidental falls. We extracted only nouns from each abstract, and four topics were identified through topic modeling, which were divided into aspects of fall prevention and its consequences. “Fall prevention program and scale” is popular among studies on the validity of fall risk assessment tools and the development of exercise and education programs. “Nursing strategy for fall prevention” is common in studies on nurse education programs and practice guidelines to improve the quality of patient safety care. “Hospitalization by fall injury” is used in studies about delayed discharge, increased costs, and deaths of subjects with fall risk factors hospitalized at medical institutions due to fall-related injuries. “Long-term care facility falls” is popular in studies about interventions to prevent fall injuries that occur in conjunction with dementia in long-term care facilities. It is necessary to establish a system and policy for fall prevention in Korean medical institutions. This study confirms the trends in domestic and international fall-related research, suggesting the need for studies to address insufficient fall-related policies and systems and translational research to be applied in clinical trials.

Suggested Citation

  • Yeji Seo & Kyunghee Kim & Ji-Su Kim, 2021. "Trends of Nursing Research on Accidental Falls: A Topic Modeling Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-15, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:8:p:3963-:d:533056
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/8/3963/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/8/3963/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David Huynh & Olivia N. Lee & Phuong M. An & Twyla A. Ens & Cynthia A. Mannion, 2021. "Bedrails and Falls in Nursing Homes: A Systematic Review," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 30(1), pages 5-11, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wenhe Min & Zhonggen Yu, 2023. "A Bibliometric Analysis of Augmented Reality in Language Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-15, April.
    2. Nadine Bachmann & Shailesh Tripathi & Manuel Brunner & Herbert Jodlbauer, 2022. "The Contribution of Data-Driven Technologies in Achieving the Sustainable Development Goals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-33, February.
    3. Andrés Calvache-Mateo & Laura López-López & Alejandro Heredia-Ciuró & Javier Martín-Núñez & Janet Rodríguez-Torres & Araceli Ortiz-Rubio & Marie Carmen Valenza, 2021. "Efficacy of Web-Based Supportive Interventions in Quality of Life in COPD Patients, a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-19, December.
    4. Jack Pun & Nathan Thomas & Neil Evan Jon Anthony Bowen, 2022. "Questioning the Sustainability of English-Medium Instruction Policy in Science Classrooms: Teachers’ and Students’ Experiences at a Hong Kong Secondary School," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-18, February.
    5. Alvisa Palese & Jessica Longhini & Angela Businarolo & Tiziana Piccin & Giuliana Pitacco & Livia Bicego, 2021. "Between Restrictive and Supportive Devices in the Context of Physical Restraints: Findings from a Large Mixed-Method Study Design," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-14, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:8:p:3963-:d:533056. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.