IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i7p3809-d530702.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Predictive Model of Gait Recovery at One Month after Hip Fracture from a National Cohort of 25,607 Patients: The Hip Fracture Prognosis (HF-Prognosis) Tool

Author

Listed:
  • Cristina González de Villaumbrosia

    (Hospital Universitario Rey Juan Carlos, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, 28933 Móstoles, Spain)

  • Pilar Sáez López

    (Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Instituto de Investigación Hospital Universitario La Paz, 28046 Madrid, Spain)

  • Isaac Martín de Diego

    (Data Science Lab, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, 28933 Móstoles, Spain)

  • Carmen Lancho Martín

    (Data Science Lab, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, 28933 Móstoles, Spain)

  • Marina Cuesta Santa Teresa

    (Data Science Lab, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, 28933 Móstoles, Spain)

  • Teresa Alarcón

    (Hospital Universitario La Paz, Instituto de Investigación Hospital Universitario La Paz, 28046 Madrid, Spain)

  • Cristina Ojeda Thies

    (Hospital Universitario 12 De Octubre, 28041 Madrid, Spain)

  • Rocío Queipo Matas

    (Data Science Lab, Universidad Europea de Madrid, 28005 Madrid, Spain)

  • Juan Ignacio González-Montalvo

    (Hospital Universitario La Paz, Instituto de Investigación Hospital Universitario La Paz, 28046 Madrid, Spain)

  • on behalf of the Participants in the Spanish National Hip Fracture Registry

    (SNHFR are listed in acknowledgments.)

Abstract

The aim of this study was to develop a predictive model of gait recovery after hip fracture. Data was obtained from a sample of 25,607 patients included in the Spanish National Hip Fracture Registry from 2017 to 2019. The primary outcome was recovery of the baseline level of ambulatory capacity. A logistic regression model was developed using 40% of the sample and the model was validated in the remaining 60% of the sample. The predictors introduced in the model were: age, prefracture gait independence, cognitive impairment, anesthetic risk, fracture type, operative delay, early postoperative mobilization, weight bearing, presence of pressure ulcers and destination at discharge. Five groups of patients or clusters were identified by their predicted probability of recovery, including the most common features of each. A probability threshold of 0.706 in the training set led to an accuracy of the model of 0.64 in the validation set. We present an acceptably accurate predictive model of gait recovery after hip fracture based on the patients’ individual characteristics. This model could aid clinicians to better target programs and interventions in this population.

Suggested Citation

  • Cristina González de Villaumbrosia & Pilar Sáez López & Isaac Martín de Diego & Carmen Lancho Martín & Marina Cuesta Santa Teresa & Teresa Alarcón & Cristina Ojeda Thies & Rocío Queipo Matas & Juan Ig, 2021. "Predictive Model of Gait Recovery at One Month after Hip Fracture from a National Cohort of 25,607 Patients: The Hip Fracture Prognosis (HF-Prognosis) Tool," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-17, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:7:p:3809-:d:530702
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/7/3809/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/7/3809/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Francisco José Tarazona-Santabalbina & Sebastià Josep Santaeugènia Gonzàlez & José Augusto García Navarro & Jose Viña, 2021. "Healthcare for Older Adults, Where Are We Moving towards?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-3, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:7:p:3809-:d:530702. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.