IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i7p3753-d529886.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Psychometric Analysis of a Microenvironment Secondhand Smoke Exposure Questionnaire

Author

Listed:
  • Teresa DeAtley

    (Department of Behavioral and Social Sciences, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI 02903, USA)

  • Suzanne M. Colby

    (Department of Behavioral and Social Sciences, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI 02903, USA)

  • Melissa A. Clark

    (Department of Health Services, Policy and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI 02903, USA)

  • Alexander Sokolovsky

    (Department of Behavioral and Social Sciences, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI 02903, USA)

  • Rachel L. Denlinger-Apte

    (Department of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27101, USA)

  • Patricia A. Cioe

    (Department of Behavioral and Social Sciences, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI 02903, USA)

  • Rachel Cassidy

    (Department of Behavioral and Social Sciences, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI 02903, USA)

  • Eric C. Donny

    (Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center and Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27101, USA)

  • Jennifer W. Tidey

    (Department of Behavioral and Social Sciences, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI 02903, USA)

Abstract

Background: We conducted a psychometric analysis of an adapted secondhand smoke (SHS) questionnaire by testing the three-component structure of the original scale that measures SHS exposure in home, work and social environments. Methods: The 15-item questionnaire was administered to 839 daily smokers participating in a multi-site randomized controlled trial. Following parallel analysis, we conducted a confirmatory factor analysis specifying a three-factor structure. Cronbach’s alphas and fit indices were calculated to assess internal consistency. Criterion validity was assessed by comparing the Social environments subscale to the Brief Wisconsin Inventory of Smoking Dependence Motives Social/Environmental Goads subscale. Predicative validity of the questionnaire was assessed using linear regressions and tobacco biomarkers of harm; NNAL, expired carbon monoxide and total cotinine. Results: Five items did not load onto any factor and were dropped, resulting in a 10-item questionnaire. The Cronbach’s alphas were (0.86), (0.77) and (0.67) for the Work, Social, and Home subscales, respectively. The WISDM subscale was moderately correlated with scores on the Social subscale (r = 0.57, p < 0.001). The questionnaire demonstrated predictive validity of smoke exposure above individual’s own reported use as measured by cigarettes smoked per day. Conclusions: Three constructs emerged; results indicate that a shortened 10-item scale could be used in future studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Teresa DeAtley & Suzanne M. Colby & Melissa A. Clark & Alexander Sokolovsky & Rachel L. Denlinger-Apte & Patricia A. Cioe & Rachel Cassidy & Eric C. Donny & Jennifer W. Tidey, 2021. "Psychometric Analysis of a Microenvironment Secondhand Smoke Exposure Questionnaire," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-10, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:7:p:3753-:d:529886
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/7/3753/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/7/3753/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:7:p:3753-:d:529886. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.