IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i7p3603-d527103.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of the Morphological Characteristics of South African Sub-Elite Female Football Players According to Playing Position

Author

Listed:
  • Anita Strauss

    (Department of Sport, Rehabilitation & Dental Science, Pretoria West Campus, Tshwane University of Technology, Pretoria 0001, South Africa
    Physical Activity, Sport and Recreation (PhASRec), North-West University, Potchefstroom 2520, South Africa)

  • Martinique Sparks

    (Physical Activity, Sport and Recreation (PhASRec), North-West University, Potchefstroom 2520, South Africa)

  • Cindy Pienaar

    (Physical Activity, Sport and Recreation (PhASRec), North-West University, Potchefstroom 2520, South Africa
    Department of Sport Studies, Faculty of Applied Sciences, Durban University of Technology, Durban 4000, South Africa)

Abstract

Limited information is available on the morphological characteristics of adult female footballers, therefore the aim of this article was to examine if there are position-specific differences in the morphological characteristics of sub-elite female football players and to establish normative standards for this level of female football players. The morphological features of 101 sub-elite female football players (age: 21.8 ± 2.7 years) were assessed. Twenty anthropometric sites were measured for body composition and somatotype. The average value of body fat percentage was 20.8 ± 5.7%. The somatotype of the overall group was 4.0–2.4–2.1. Significant ( p ≤ 0.05) differences were found between goalkeepers and outfield players in morphological characteristics. Goalkeepers were taller (166.2 ± 8.4 cm), heavier (66.5 ± 5.1 kg), possessed the highest body fat percentage (17.2 ± 6.2%) and showed higher values for all skinfold (sum of 6 skinfolds = 125.6 ± 45.9 cm), breadth, girth and length measurements. However, there were very few practically worthwhile differences between the outfield positions. Positional groups did not differ ( p ≤ 0.05) in somatotype characteristics either. The study suggests that at sub-elite level there are mainly differences between goalkeepers and outfield players, but outfield players are homogeneous when comparing morphological characteristics. These results may serve as normative values for future comparisons regarding the morphological characteristics of female football players.

Suggested Citation

  • Anita Strauss & Martinique Sparks & Cindy Pienaar, 2021. "Comparison of the Morphological Characteristics of South African Sub-Elite Female Football Players According to Playing Position," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-13, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:7:p:3603-:d:527103
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/7/3603/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/7/3603/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:7:p:3603-:d:527103. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.