IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i7p3500-d525517.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quadratus Lumborum and Transversus Abdominis Plane Blocks and Their Impact on Acute and Chronic Pain in Patients after Cesarean Section: A Randomized Controlled Study

Author

Listed:
  • Michał Borys

    (Second Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Medical University of Lublin, 20-059 Lublin, Poland)

  • Aleksandra Zamaro

    (Department of Obstetrics and Perinatology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-091 Warszawa, Poland)

  • Beata Horeczy

    (Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Department with the Center for Acute Poisoning, St. Jadwiga Provincial Clinical Hospital, 35-301 Rzeszów, Poland)

  • Ewa Gęszka

    (Department of Obstetrics and Perinatology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-091 Warszawa, Poland)

  • Marek Janiak

    (First Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-091 Warszawa, Poland)

  • Piotr Węgrzyn

    (Department of Obstetrics and Perinatology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-091 Warszawa, Poland)

  • Mirosław Czuczwar

    (Second Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Medical University of Lublin, 20-059 Lublin, Poland)

  • Paweł Piwowarczyk

    (Second Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Medical University of Lublin, 20-059 Lublin, Poland)

Abstract

Background: Severe postoperative pain is a significant problem after cesarean sections. Methods: This study was a randomized, controlled trial of 105 patients conducted in two hospitals. All patients were anesthetized spinally for elective cesarean section. Each participant was randomly allocated to one of three study groups: the quadratus lumborum block (QLB) group, the transversus abdominis plane block (TAPB) group, or the control (CON) group. The primary outcome of this study determined acute pain intensity on the visual analog scale (VAS). The secondary outcomes determined morphine consumption and chronic pain evaluation according to the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) after hospital discharge. Results: At rest, the pain intensity was significantly higher in the CON group than in the QLB and TAPB groups at hours two and eight. Upon activity, the pain in the control subjects was more severe than in the QLB and TAPB groups in three and two of five measurements, respectively. Moreover, morphine consumption was significantly lower in the QLB (9 (5–10)) and TAPB (10 (6–14)) groups than in the CON (16 (11–19)) group. Persistent postoperative pain was significantly lower in the QLB group than in the CON group at months one and six following hospital discharge. Conclusions: Both the QLB and TAPB can improve pain management after cesarean delivery. Moreover, the QLB might reduce the severity of persistent postoperative pain months after cesarean section.

Suggested Citation

  • Michał Borys & Aleksandra Zamaro & Beata Horeczy & Ewa Gęszka & Marek Janiak & Piotr Węgrzyn & Mirosław Czuczwar & Paweł Piwowarczyk, 2021. "Quadratus Lumborum and Transversus Abdominis Plane Blocks and Their Impact on Acute and Chronic Pain in Patients after Cesarean Section: A Randomized Controlled Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-12, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:7:p:3500-:d:525517
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/7/3500/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/7/3500/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marcin Mieszkowski & Marek Janiak & Michał Borys & Paweł Radkowski & Marta Mieszkowska & Yauheni Zhalniarovich & Dariusz Onichimowski, 2021. "Effect of Bilateral Quadratus Lumborum Block Type I on Patient Satisfaction and Incidence of Chronic Postsurgical Pain Following Cesarean Section-A Randomized Controlled Trial," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-10, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:7:p:3500-:d:525517. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.