IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i7p3498-d525506.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Performance of the EWGSOP2 Cut-Points of Low Grip Strength for Identifying Sarcopenia and Frailty Phenotype: A Cross-Sectional Study in Older Inpatients

Author

Listed:
  • Anna K. Stuck

    (Department of Geriatrics, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3010 Bern, Switzerland)

  • Nina C. Mäder

    (Medical Faculty, University of Bern, 3012 Bern, Switzerland)

  • Dominic Bertschi

    (Department of Geriatrics, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3010 Bern, Switzerland)

  • Andreas Limacher

    (CTU Bern, University of Bern, 3012 Bern, Switzerland)

  • Reto W. Kressig

    (University Department of Geriatric Medicine FELIX PLATTER, University of Basel, 4055 Basel, Switzerland)

Abstract

Background: The European Working Group on Sarcopenia has recently proposed revised cut-off values for the definition of low grip strength (EWGSOP2). We therefore compared performance of the EWGSOP2 cut-off definition of low grip strength with other internationally used cut-off points in a sample of older patients. Methods: We analyzed geriatric assessment data in a cross-sectional sample of 98 older patients admitted to a post-acute care hospital. First, we compared prevalence of sarcopenia and frailty phenotype in our sample using low grip strength cut-points from the EWGSOP2 and seven other internationally used consensus statements. Second, we calculated correlations between low grip strength and two independent surrogate outcomes (i.e., gait speed, and the clinical frailty scale) for the EWGSOP2 and the other seven cut-point definitions. Results: Prevalence of sarcopenia based on the EWGSOP2 grip strength cut-off values was significantly lower (10.2%) than five of the seven other cut-point definitions (e.g., 19.4% based on Sarcopenia Definitions and Outcomes Consortium (SDOC) criteria). Similarly, frailty phenotype prevalence was significantly lower based on EWGSOP2 cut-points (57.1%) as compared to SDOC (70.4%). The correlation coefficient of gait speed with low grip strength based on EWGSOP2 cut-points was lower (0.145) as compared to other criteria (e.g., SDOC 0.240). Conclusions: Sarcopenia and frailty phenotype were identified considerably less using the EWGSOP2 cut-points for low grip strength, potentially underestimating prevalence of sarcopenia and frailty phenotype in post-acute hospital patients.

Suggested Citation

  • Anna K. Stuck & Nina C. Mäder & Dominic Bertschi & Andreas Limacher & Reto W. Kressig, 2021. "Performance of the EWGSOP2 Cut-Points of Low Grip Strength for Identifying Sarcopenia and Frailty Phenotype: A Cross-Sectional Study in Older Inpatients," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-10, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:7:p:3498-:d:525506
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/7/3498/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/7/3498/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alex Barreto de Lima & Duarte Henrinques-Neto & Gustavo dos Santos Ribeiro & Elvio Rúbio Gouveia & Fátima Baptista, 2022. "Muscle Weakness and Walking Slowness for the Identification of Sarcopenia in the Older Adults from Northern Brazil: A Cross-Sectional Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-12, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:7:p:3498-:d:525506. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.