IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i7p3413-d524126.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Subjective versus Objective Measure of Physical Activity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Convergent Validity of the Physical Activity Questionnaire for Children (PAQ-C)

Author

Listed:
  • Danilo Marasso

    (School of Exercise and Sport Sciences (SUISM), University of Torino, 10124 Turin, Italy)

  • Corrado Lupo

    (NeuroMuscularFunction Research Group, School of Exercise and Sport Sciences (SUISM), Department of Medical Sciences, University of Torino, 10143 Turin, Italy)

  • Simone Collura

    (School of Exercise and Sport Sciences (SUISM), University of Torino, 10124 Turin, Italy)

  • Alberto Rainoldi

    (NeuroMuscularFunction Research Group, School of Exercise and Sport Sciences (SUISM), Department of Medical Sciences, University of Torino, 10143 Turin, Italy)

  • Paolo Riccardo Brustio

    (NeuroMuscularFunction Research Group, School of Exercise and Sport Sciences (SUISM), Department of Medical Sciences, University of Torino, 10143 Turin, Italy)

Abstract

This study aimed to highlight the relationship between moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) as assessed by accelerometer devices and the Physical Activity Questionnaire for Children (PAQ-C) to estimate the convergent validity of the questionnaire. A systematic review and a meta-analysis were applied by collecting pertinent studies (PubMed, Web of Science, PsycINFO, and SCOPUS) from 1997 until November 2020. The relationship between PAQ-C and MVPA scores was estimated considering correlation coefficients such as the effect size. Fisher’s transformation was used to convert each correlation coefficient into an approximately normal distribution. The pooled correlations between PAQ-C and MVPA scores were measured by r values after converting the Fisher’s z values back into correlation coefficients for presentation. A total of 13 studies were included in the meta-analysis, and a random effects model was adopted. The pooled correlation between PAQ-C and MVPA scores was significant but with a moderate effect size (r = 0.34 [0.29, 0.39], Z = 15.00, p < 0.001). No heterogeneity among the studies was observed (I 2 < 25%). In conclusion, the results highlighted a moderate relationship (around 0.30–0.40) between PAQ-C and accelerometer measurements. These results suggested to concurrently administer both tools to reach a more comprehensive description of children’s PA, in terms of quality and quantity.

Suggested Citation

  • Danilo Marasso & Corrado Lupo & Simone Collura & Alberto Rainoldi & Paolo Riccardo Brustio, 2021. "Subjective versus Objective Measure of Physical Activity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Convergent Validity of the Physical Activity Questionnaire for Children (PAQ-C)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-14, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:7:p:3413-:d:524126
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/7/3413/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/7/3413/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jing-Jing Wang & Tom Baranowski & Patrick W. C. Lau & Tzu-An Chen & Shu-Ge Zhang, 2016. "Psychological Correlates of Self-Reported and Objectively Measured Physical Activity among Chinese Children—Psychological Correlates of PA," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-12, October.
    2. repec:mpr:mprres:8148 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dyah Anantalia Widyastari & Pairoj Saonuam & Niramon Rasri & Kornkanok Pongpradit & Piyawat Katewongsa, 2021. "Prevalence and Trends of Physical Activity in Thai Children and Young People: Pooled Panel Data Analysis from Thailand’s Surveillance on Physical Activity 2012–2020," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-14, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chun-Qing Zhang & Pak-Kwong Chung & Shi-Shi Cheng & Vincent Wing-Chun Yeung & Ru Zhang & Sam Liu & Ryan E. Rhodes, 2020. "An Update on Physical Activity Research among Children in Hong Kong: A Scoping Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-25, November.
    2. Orlagh Farmer & Kevin Cahill & Wesley O’Brien, 2020. "Gaelic4Girls—The Effectiveness of a 10-Week Multicomponent Community Sports-Based Physical Activity Intervention for 8 to 12-Year-Old Girls," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-19, September.
    3. Ming-jian Nie & Chao-qun Fan & Rui-zhe Sun & Jing-jing Wang & Qiang Feng & Yan-feng Zhang & Zhi Yao & Mei Wang, 2019. "Accelerometer-Measured Physical Activity in Children and Adolescents at Altitudes over 3500 Meters: A Cross-Sectional Study in Tibet," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-16, February.
    4. Andre Koka & Henri Tilga & Hanna Kalajas-Tilga & Vello Hein & Lennart Raudsepp, 2019. "Perceived Controlling Behaviors of Physical Education Teachers and Objectively Measured Leisure-Time Physical Activity in Adolescents," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-17, July.
    5. Ke-Tsung Han & Po-Ching Wang, 2017. "Validity of Research-Grade Actigraphy Unit for Measuring Exercise Intensity," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-13, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:7:p:3413-:d:524126. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.