IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i6p3186-d520415.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Beyond the Normative Family Meal Promotion: A Narrative Review of Qualitative Results about Ordinary Domestic Commensality

Author

Listed:
  • Fairley Le Moal

    (Centre Max Weber-UMR 5283, Université Lumière-Lyon 2, 69676 Bron, France
    Social Sciences Group, Institut Paul Bocuse Research Center, 69130 Ecully, France
    College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Bedfork Park, SA 5042, Australia)

  • Maxime Michaud

    (Social Sciences Group, Institut Paul Bocuse Research Center, 69130 Ecully, France)

  • Carol Anne Hartwick-Pflaum

    (R&D, Mars Food Global, 3261 LW Oud-Beijerland, The Netherlands)

  • Georgia Middleton

    (College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Bedfork Park, SA 5042, Australia)

  • Isabelle Mallon

    (Centre Max Weber-UMR 5283, Université Lumière-Lyon 2, 69676 Bron, France)

  • John Coveney

    (College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Bedfork Park, SA 5042, Australia)

Abstract

There exists a normative representation of family meals in contemporary Western societies which is promoted as imperative through public health programs, larger discourses and by some studies in the nutritional and public health research fields. Family meals, also called domestic commensality, are represented as convivial events and are associated with positive health and wellbeing outcomes but there is minimal evidence to show they are beneficial for family members and it is not known which aspect of the family meal could be responsible for these alleged benefits. This normative family meal image is based on a representation of the family as a peaceful unit exempt from external constraints. This narrative literature review of qualitative studies of family meals seeks to put forward the underlying premises of this representation and compare it with reports about actual practices. The results emphasize that eating together is still practiced and remains valued by family members, which is in contrast to discourses lamenting the decline of the family meal. However, the valorisation and recurrence of family meals depends on class, gender and cultural positions. There is a gap between the norm of healthy or convivial and achievable family meals, which can reinforce the so-called “mental load” and “emotion work” of those in charge of feeding the family and heighten inequalities within the household. In fact, there are many challenges to family meals which originate from external constraints or are inherent aspects of family life. The results from this review suggest that we should focus on family meals by taking into account the food work surrounding it and focussing on the interactional aspects of family meals. Ethnographic methods allow the researcher to observe the diversities and complexities of commensality as well as family dynamics and, in doing so, could provide more realistic representations of eating within the family.

Suggested Citation

  • Fairley Le Moal & Maxime Michaud & Carol Anne Hartwick-Pflaum & Georgia Middleton & Isabelle Mallon & John Coveney, 2021. "Beyond the Normative Family Meal Promotion: A Narrative Review of Qualitative Results about Ordinary Domestic Commensality," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-23, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:6:p:3186-:d:520415
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/6/3186/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/6/3186/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lillian Fenner & Cathy Banwell, 2019. "What Do the ‘Breadwinners’ Do? Understanding Fathers’ Roles in Family Food Work in Australia," Global Journal of Health Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(3), pages 1-1, March.
    2. Kafia Ayadi & Joël Bree, 2010. "An ethnography of the transfer of food learning within the family," Post-Print hal-00565490, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Håkan Jönsson & Maxime Michaud & Nicklas Neuman, 2021. "What Is Commensality? A Critical Discussion of an Expanding Research Field," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-17, June.
    2. Carmen Cipriano-Crespo & Francesc-Xavier Medina & Lorenzo Mariano-Juárez, 2022. "Culinary Solitude in the Diet of People with Functional Diversity," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-13, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:6:p:3186-:d:520415. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.