IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i6p3161-d520078.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Are Orienteers Protected Enough against Tick Bites? Estimating Human Exposure to Tick Bites through a Participative Science Survey during an Orienteering Competition

Author

Listed:
  • Jonas Durand

    (Tous Chercheurs Laboratory, UMR 1136 ‘Interactions Arbres Micro-Organismes’, INRAE—Lorraine University, Centre INRAE Grand Est-Nancy, F-54280 Champenoux, France
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Laure Bournez

    (Nancy Laboratory for Rabies and Wildlife, The French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health and Safety (ANSES), F-54220 Malzéville, France
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Julien Marchand

    (CPIE Champenoux, F-54280 Champenoux, France)

  • Claire Schmid

    (Nancy Laboratory for Rabies and Wildlife, The French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health and Safety (ANSES), F-54220 Malzéville, France)

  • Irene Carravieri

    (Tous Chercheurs Laboratory, UMR 1136 ‘Interactions Arbres Micro-Organismes’, INRAE—Lorraine University, Centre INRAE Grand Est-Nancy, F-54280 Champenoux, France
    CPIE Champenoux, F-54280 Champenoux, France)

  • Béatrice Palin

    (Tous Chercheurs Laboratory, UMR 1136 ‘Interactions Arbres Micro-Organismes’, INRAE—Lorraine University, Centre INRAE Grand Est-Nancy, F-54280 Champenoux, France)

  • Cyril Galley

    (CPIE Champenoux, F-54280 Champenoux, France)

  • Vincent Godard

    (Department of Geography, Université Paris 8, UMR LADYSS CNRS, F-93200 Saint-Denis, France)

  • Annick Brun-Jacob

    (Tous Chercheurs Laboratory, UMR 1136 ‘Interactions Arbres Micro-Organismes’, INRAE—Lorraine University, Centre INRAE Grand Est-Nancy, F-54280 Champenoux, France)

  • Jean-François Cosson

    (UMR BIPAR, INRAE, F-94700 Maisons-Alfort, France
    passed away.)

  • Pascale Frey-Klett

    (US 1371 Laboratory of Excellence ARBRE, INRAE, Centre INRAE Grand Est-Nancy, F-54280 Champenoux, France)

Abstract

Mass-participation events in temperate forests are now well-established features of outdoor activities and represent high-risk activities regarding human exposition to tick bites. In this study we used a citizen science approach to quantify the space–time frequency of tick bites and undetected tick bites among orienteers that participated in a 6-day orienteering competition that took place in July 2018 in the forests of Eastern France, and we looked at the use and efficacy of different preventive behaviors. Our study confirms that orienteers are a high-risk population for tick bites, with 62.4% of orienteers bitten at least once during the competition, and 2.4 to 12.1 orienteers per 100 orienteers were bitten by ticks when walking 1 km. In addition, 16.7% of orienteers bitten by ticks had engorged ticks, meaning that they did not detect and remove their ticks immediately after the run. Further, only 8.5% of orienteers systematically used a repellent, and the use of repellent only partially reduced the probability of being bitten by ticks. These results represent the first attempt to quantify the risk of not immediately detecting a tick bite and provide rare quantitative data on the frequency of tick bites for orienteers according to walking distance and time spent in the forest. The results also provide information on the use of repellent, which will be very helpful for modeling risk assessment. The study also shows that prevention should be increased for orienteers in France.

Suggested Citation

  • Jonas Durand & Laure Bournez & Julien Marchand & Claire Schmid & Irene Carravieri & Béatrice Palin & Cyril Galley & Vincent Godard & Annick Brun-Jacob & Jean-François Cosson & Pascale Frey-Klett, 2021. "Are Orienteers Protected Enough against Tick Bites? Estimating Human Exposure to Tick Bites through a Participative Science Survey during an Orienteering Competition," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-19, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:6:p:3161-:d:520078
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/6/3161/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/6/3161/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jiří Černý & Geoffrey Lynn & Johana Hrnková & Maryna Golovchenko & Natalia Rudenko & Libor Grubhoffer, 2020. "Management Options for Ixodes ricinus -Associated Pathogens: A Review of Prevention Strategies," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-18, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nicholas Johnson & Lawrence Paul Phipps & Kayleigh M. Hansford & Arran J. Folly & Anthony R. Fooks & Jolyon M. Medlock & Karen L. Mansfield, 2022. "One Health Approach to Tick and Tick-Borne Disease Surveillance in the United Kingdom," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(10), pages 1-12, May.
    2. Chrysa Voyiatzaki & Sevastiani I. Papailia & Maria S. Venetikou & John Pouris & Maria E. Tsoumani & Effie G. Papageorgiou, 2022. "Climate Changes Exacerbate the Spread of Ixodes ricinus and the Occurrence of Lyme Borreliosis and Tick-Borne Encephalitis in Europe—How Climate Models Are Used as a Risk Assessment Approach for Tick-," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-14, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:6:p:3161-:d:520078. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.