IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i5p2555-d510395.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sex Education in the Spotlight: What Is Working? Systematic Review

Author

Listed:
  • María Lameiras-Fernández

    (Faculty of Education and Social Work, University of Vigo, 32004 Ourense, Spain)

  • Rosana Martínez-Román

    (Faculty of Education and Social Work, University of Vigo, 32004 Ourense, Spain)

  • María Victoria Carrera-Fernández

    (Faculty of Education and Social Work, University of Vigo, 32004 Ourense, Spain)

  • Yolanda Rodríguez-Castro

    (Faculty of Education and Social Work, University of Vigo, 32004 Ourense, Spain)

Abstract

Adolescence, a period of physical, social, cognitive and emotional development, represents a target population for sexual health promotion and education when it comes to achieving the 2030 Agenda goals for sustainable and equitable societies. The aim of this study is to provide an overview of what is known about the dissemination and effectiveness of sex education programs and thereby to inform better public policy making in this area. Methodology : We carried out a systematic review based on international scientific literature, in which only peer-reviewed papers were included. To identify reviews, we carried out an electronic search of the Cochrane Database Reviews, ERIC, Web of Science, PubMed, Medline, Scopus and PsycINFO. This paper provides a narrative review of reviews of the literature from 2015 to 2020. Results : 20 reviews met the inclusion criteria (10 in school settings, 9 using digital platforms and 1 blended learning program): they focused mainly on reducing risk behaviors (e.g., VIH/STIs and unwanted pregnancies), whilst obviating themes such as desire and pleasure, which were not included in outcome evaluations. The reviews with the lowest risk of bias are those carried out in school settings and are the ones that most question the effectiveness of sex education programs. Whilst the reviews of digital platforms and blended learning show greater effectiveness in terms of promoting sexual and reproductive health in adolescents (ASRH), they nevertheless also include greater risks of bias. Conclusion : A more rigorous assessment of the effectiveness of sexual education programs is necessary, especially regarding the opportunities offered by new technologies, which may lead to more cost-effective interventions than with in-person programs. Moreover, blended learning programs offer a promising way forward, as they combine the best of face-to-face and digital interventions, and may provide an excellent tool in the new context of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Suggested Citation

  • María Lameiras-Fernández & Rosana Martínez-Román & María Victoria Carrera-Fernández & Yolanda Rodríguez-Castro, 2021. "Sex Education in the Spotlight: What Is Working? Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-31, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:5:p:2555-:d:510395
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/5/2555/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/5/2555/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:5:p:2555-:d:510395. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.