IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i5p2341-d507224.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Variety of Surgical Guides and Protocols for Bone Reduction Prior to Implant Placement: A Narrative Review

Author

Listed:
  • Eitan Mijiritsky

    (Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck and Maxillofacial Surgery, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv 6139001, Israel
    The Maurice and Gabriela Goldschleger School of Dental Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 6997801, Israel
    Equal contribution.)

  • Hadar Ben Zaken

    (Department of Periodontology, Hadassah Faculty of Dental Medicine, Hebrew University, Jerusalem 91905, Israel
    Equal contribution.)

  • Maayan Shacham

    (School of Social Work, Ariel University, Ariel 40700, Israel)

  • Ihsan Caglar Cinar

    (Department of Oral Implantology, Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul University, Istanbul 34093, Turkey)

  • Cem Tore

    (Department of Oral Implantology, Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul University, Istanbul 34093, Turkey)

  • Katalin Nagy

    (Department of Oral Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Szeged, Tisza L. krt 64, 6720 Szeged, Hungary)

  • Scott D. Ganz

    (Department of Restorative Dentistry Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Newark, NJ 07103, USA
    Independent Researcher, Fort Lee, NJ 07024, USA)

Abstract

Edentulism and terminal dentition are still considered significant problems in the dental field, posing a great challenge for surgical and restorative solutions especially with immediate loading protocols. When the implant placement is planned immediately after extraction with irregular bone topography or there is an un-leveled alveolar ridge topography for any other reason, bone reduction may be required to level the alveolar crest in order to create the desired bone architecture allowing for sufficient bone width for implant placement and to insure adequate inter-arch restorative space. Bone reduction protocols exist in analog and digitally planned methodologies, with or without surgical guides to achieve the desired bone level based upon the desired position of the implants with regard to the restorative outcome. The objective of this paper was to scrutinize the literature regarding the practice of bone reduction in conjunction with implant placement, and to review different types of bone reduction surgical guides. Results: The literature reveals different protocols that provide for bone reduction with a variety of bone reduction methods. The digitally-planned surgical guide based on Cone-Beam computerized tomography (CBCT) scan reconstructed data can improve accuracy, reduce surgical time, and deliver the desired bone level for the implant placement with fewer surgical and restorative complications. The clinician’s choice is based on personal experience, training, and comfort with a specific guide type. Conclusions: Bone reduction, when required, is an indispensable step in the surgical procedure to attain suitable width of bone in anticipation of implant placement ideally determined by the desired tooth position and required restorative space based on material selection for the chosen framework design, i.e., hybrid, monolithic zirconia. Additionally, bone reduction and implant placement can be accomplished in the same surgical procedure, minimizing trauma and the need for two separate interventions.

Suggested Citation

  • Eitan Mijiritsky & Hadar Ben Zaken & Maayan Shacham & Ihsan Caglar Cinar & Cem Tore & Katalin Nagy & Scott D. Ganz, 2021. "Variety of Surgical Guides and Protocols for Bone Reduction Prior to Implant Placement: A Narrative Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-16, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:5:p:2341-:d:507224
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/5/2341/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/5/2341/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:5:p:2341-:d:507224. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.