IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i4p2029-d502077.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Preliminary Evidence That Taping Does Not Optimize Joint Coupling of the Foot and Ankle Joints in Patients with Chronic Ankle Instability

Author

Listed:
  • Charles Deltour

    (Department of Orthopaedics, University Hospitals Leuven, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium)

  • Bart Dingenen

    (Reval Rehabilitation Research Centre, Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, Hasselt University, 3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium)

  • Filip Staes

    (Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium)

  • Kevin Deschamps

    (Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium)

  • Giovanni A. Matricali

    (Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
    Institute of Orthopaedic Research and Training, University Hospitals Leuven, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
    Department of Orthopaedics, Foot & Ankle Unit, University Hospitals Leuven, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium)

Abstract

Background: Foot–ankle motion is affected by chronic ankle instability (CAI) in terms of altered kinematics. This study focuses on multisegmental foot–ankle motion and joint coupling in barefoot and taped CAI patients during the three subphases of stance at running. Methods: Foot segmental motion data of 12 controls and 15 CAI participants during running with a heel strike pattern were collected through gait analysis. CAI participants performed running trials in three conditions: barefoot running, and running with high-dye and low-dye taping. Dependent variables were the range of motion (RoM) occurring at the different inter-segment angles as well as the cross-correlation coefficients between predetermined segments. Results: There were no significant RoM differences for barefoot running between CAI patients and controls. In taped conditions, the first two subphases only showed RoM changes at the midfoot without apparent RoM reduction compared to the barefoot CAI condition. In the last subphase there was limited RoM reduction at the mid- and rearfoot. Cross-correlation coefficients highlighted a tendency towards weaker joint coupling in the barefoot CAI condition compared to the controls. Joint coupling within the taped CAI conditions did not show optimization compared to the barefoot CAI condition. Conclusions: RoM was not significantly changed for barefoot running between CAI patients and controls. In taped conditions, there was no distinct tendency towards lower mean RoM values due to the mechanical restraints of taping. Joint coupling in CAI patients was not optimized by taping.

Suggested Citation

  • Charles Deltour & Bart Dingenen & Filip Staes & Kevin Deschamps & Giovanni A. Matricali, 2021. "Preliminary Evidence That Taping Does Not Optimize Joint Coupling of the Foot and Ankle Joints in Patients with Chronic Ankle Instability," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-11, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:4:p:2029-:d:502077
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/4/2029/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/4/2029/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:4:p:2029-:d:502077. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.