IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i4p1996-d501722.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

More Teeth and Posterior Balanced Occlusion Are a Key Determinant for Cognitive Function in the Elderly

Author

Listed:
  • Taejun Park

    (Department of Preventive Dentistry, Kyungpook National University School of Dentistry, Daegu 41940, Korea)

  • Yun-Sook Jung

    (Department of Dental Hygiene, Kyungpook National University College of Science & Technology, Sangju 37224, Korea)

  • Keunbada Son

    (Department of Dental Science, Graduate School, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41940, Korea)

  • Yong-Chul Bae

    (Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41940, Korea)

  • Keun-Bae Song

    (Department of Preventive Dentistry, Kyungpook National University School of Dentistry, Daegu 41940, Korea)

  • Atsuo Amano

    (Department of Preventive Dentistry, Osaka University Graduate School of Dentistry, Osaka 565-0871, Japan)

  • Youn-Hee Choi

    (Department of Preventive Dentistry, Kyungpook National University School of Dentistry, Daegu 41940, Korea
    Institute for Translational Research in Dentistry, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41940, Korea)

Abstract

Age-related decline in cognitive function is a major challenge in geriatric healthcare. A possible explanation is that the tooth loss or low chewing ability is at cause of cognitive impairment or dementia. The study aimed to investigate the potential relationship between chewing ability and cognitive function in the elderly. A total of 563 participants aged 65 years or over residing in urban and rural areas of South Korea were surveyed. The chewing ability was measured by objectively measurable indications such as the number of remaining teeth, denture status, color-changeable gum, and occlusal balance using T-Scan III ® . The cognitive function was measured by the Korean version of Mini-Mental State Examination-Dementia Screening (MMSE-DS) and a score of 24 or more (out of 30) indicates a normal cognition, below 23 indicates cognitive impairment. The association between socio-demographic factors, chewing ability factors, and cognitive function demonstrated statistically significant results. When comparing the denture status and chewing ability, the proportion of need denture group had fewer remaining teeth and anterior balanced occlusion. The average number of remaining teeth in anterior balanced occlusion with cognitive impairment was 11.2 compared to posterior balanced occlusion with the normal cognition 19.2. A multiple linear regression analysis declared a significant correlation between number of remaining teeth, denture status, occlusal balance, and cognitive function. Results of the present study revealed objectively measurable indications are suitable for chewing ability assessment and correlated with cognitive function.

Suggested Citation

  • Taejun Park & Yun-Sook Jung & Keunbada Son & Yong-Chul Bae & Keun-Bae Song & Atsuo Amano & Youn-Hee Choi, 2021. "More Teeth and Posterior Balanced Occlusion Are a Key Determinant for Cognitive Function in the Elderly," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-10, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:4:p:1996-:d:501722
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/4/1996/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/4/1996/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:4:p:1996-:d:501722. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.