IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i4p1785-d498232.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Health-Related Quality of Life in Weight Loss Interventions: Results from the OPTIWIN Trial

Author

Listed:
  • Livia Dainelli

    (Nestlé Research, Nestlé, 1000 Lausanne, Switzerland)

  • Dan Roberto Luo

    (Nestlé Research, Nestlé, 1000 Lausanne, Switzerland)

  • Sarah S. Cohen

    (EpidStrategies, Durham, NC 27101, USA)

  • Agnieszka Marczewska

    (Nestlé Health Science, Nestlé, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland)

  • Jamy D. Ard

    (Department of Epidemiology and Prevention, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27101, USA)

  • Sally L. Coburn

    (Alaska Premier Health, Anchorage, AK 99503, USA)

  • Kristina H. Lewis

    (Department of Epidemiology and Prevention, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27101, USA)

  • Judy Loper

    (The Central Ohio Nutrition Center, Inc., Gohanna, OH 43230, USA)

  • Laura E. Matarese

    (Department of Surgery, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC 27101, USA)

  • Walter J. Pories

    (Department of Surgery, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC 27101, USA)

  • Amy E. Rothberg

    (Department of Nutritional Sciences, School of Public Health and Department of Internal Medicine, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Harbour, MI 48109-2029, USA)

Abstract

Obesity is highly prevalent and associated with several adverse outcomes including health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL), work productivity, and activity impairment. The objective of this study is to examine group differences in HRQoL and labor-related health outcomes among participants in the OPTIWIN program, which compared the effectiveness of two intensive behavioral weight loss interventions. Participants ( n = 273) were randomized to OPTIFAST ® (OP) or food-based (FB) dietary interventions for 52 weeks. HRQoL and labor-related health outcomes were measured at baseline, week 26, and week 52, using two questionnaires. At baseline, there were no differences between groups on the Impact of Weight on Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (IWQOL-Lite). At week 26, the OP group had statistically significant differences towards better HRQoL for Physical Function, Self-Esteem, and the total score compared with the FB group. At week 52, the OP group showed better HRQoL in the total score ( p = 0.0012) and in all but one domain. Moreover, the adjusted change-from-baseline normalized total score at week 52 was −5.9 points ( p = 0.0001). Finally, the mean IWQOL-Lite normalized score showed that HRQoL improves by 0.4442 units ( p < 0.0001) per kg lost, and that greater weight reduction was positively associated with better HRQoL. No statistically significant group differences were found with the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (General Health) (WPAI-GH) Questionnaire. HRQoL improves with highly intensive, well-structured weight loss interventions. Greater weight loss lead to larger improvements. The lack of negative effect on productivity and activity suggests that these interventions may be compatible with an active work lifestyle.

Suggested Citation

  • Livia Dainelli & Dan Roberto Luo & Sarah S. Cohen & Agnieszka Marczewska & Jamy D. Ard & Sally L. Coburn & Kristina H. Lewis & Judy Loper & Laura E. Matarese & Walter J. Pories & Amy E. Rothberg, 2021. "Health-Related Quality of Life in Weight Loss Interventions: Results from the OPTIWIN Trial," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-11, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:4:p:1785-:d:498232
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/4/1785/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/4/1785/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:4:p:1785-:d:498232. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.