IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i4p1429-d492743.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Attitudes of Undergraduate Nursing Students towards Patient Safety: A Quasi-Experimental Study

Author

Listed:
  • Nuria Cantero-López

    (Department of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universitat Jaume I, 12071 Castellón, Spain)

  • Víctor M. González-Chordá

    (Department of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universitat Jaume I, 12071 Castellón, Spain)

  • María Jesús Valero-Chillerón

    (Department of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universitat Jaume I, 12071 Castellón, Spain)

  • Desirée Mena-Tudela

    (Department of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universitat Jaume I, 12071 Castellón, Spain)

  • Laura Andreu-Pejó

    (Department of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universitat Jaume I, 12071 Castellón, Spain)

  • Rafael Vila-Candel

    (Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, La Ribera University Hospital, FISABIO, Crta. Corbera km 1, 46600 Valencia, Spain
    Department of Nursing, Faculty of Nursing and Podiatry, University of Valencia, Jaume Roig, s/n, 46010 Valencia, Spain)

  • Águeda Cervera-Gasch

    (Department of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universitat Jaume I, 12071 Castellón, Spain)

Abstract

Improving nursing students’ attitudes towards patient safety is a current and relevant topic. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of an educational intervention based on critical incident and root cause analysis (RCA) techniques regarding attitudes towards patient safety in nursing students. A quasi-experimental before and after study was developed between January 2018 and December 2019 in a sample of 100 nursing students at Universitat Jaume I (Spain). The intervention was developed in two phases. Phase I was at university, where students applied the RCA technique in a real case. Phase II took place during clinical practice. Students used critical incidents to identify a risk situation for the patients and applied RCA to detect its root causes. The measurement of attitudes was performed with the Attitudes to Patient Safety Questionnaire (APSQ-III). The global score of the questionnaire in the baseline measurement was 3.911 (±0.335), in the intermediate measurement it was 4.031 (±0.337) and in the final measurement it was 4.052 (±0.335), with significant differences ( p = 0.03). However, intra-group differences were observed in the final measurement ( p = 0.021). The teamwork dimension had the highest mean score on all three measures and the notification dimension had the lowest mean scores. An educational intervention combining critical incident and RCA techniques can improves nursing students’ attitudes toward patient safety.

Suggested Citation

  • Nuria Cantero-López & Víctor M. González-Chordá & María Jesús Valero-Chillerón & Desirée Mena-Tudela & Laura Andreu-Pejó & Rafael Vila-Candel & Águeda Cervera-Gasch, 2021. "Attitudes of Undergraduate Nursing Students towards Patient Safety: A Quasi-Experimental Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-11, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:4:p:1429-:d:492743
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/4/1429/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/4/1429/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hao Chen & Chao Liu & Fang Zhou & Xin-Yi Cao & Kan Wu & Yi-Lang Chen & Chia-Yih Liu & Ding-Hau Huang & Wen-Ko Chiou, 2022. "Focused-Attention Meditation Improves Flow, Communication Skills, and Safety Attitudes of Surgeons," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-15, April.
    2. Joaquina Montilla-Herrador & José A. Lozano-Meca & Aitor Baño-Alcaraz & Carmen Lillo-Navarro & Rodrigo Martín-San Agustín & Mariano Gacto-Sánchez, 2022. "Knowledge and Attitudes towards Patient Safety among Students in Physical Therapy in Spain: A Longitudinal Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-11, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:4:p:1429-:d:492743. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.