IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i3p881-d484030.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Eustachian Tube Function Assessment after Radiofrequency Turbinate Reduction in Atopic and Non-Atopic Patients

Author

Listed:
  • Francesco Martines

    (Bi.N.D. Department, University of Palermo, Via del Vespro, 129, 90127 Palermo, Italy
    Istituto Euromediterraneo di Scienza e Tecnologia—IEMEST, Via M. Miraglia 20, 90139 Palermo, Italy)

  • Francesco Dispenza

    (Istituto Euromediterraneo di Scienza e Tecnologia—IEMEST, Via M. Miraglia 20, 90139 Palermo, Italy
    ENT Department, A.O.U.P. Paolo Giaccone, Via del Vespro, 129, 90127 Palermo, Italy)

  • Federico Sireci

    (ENT Department, A.O.U.P. Paolo Giaccone, Via del Vespro, 129, 90127 Palermo, Italy)

  • Salvatore Gallina

    (ENT Department, A.O.U.P. Paolo Giaccone, Via del Vespro, 129, 90127 Palermo, Italy)

  • Pietro Salvago

    (Bi.N.D. Department, University of Palermo, Via del Vespro, 129, 90127 Palermo, Italy)

Abstract

(1) Background: Inferior turbinates’ hypertrophy is often associated with Eustachian tube dysfunction (ETD); radiofrequency turbinate reduction (RTR) may provide a long-term improvement of nasal obstruction and ETD-related symptoms. (2) Aim: The study aimed to compare ETD in atopic and non-atopic patients before and after RTR and to investigate the correlation between tympanometry and Eustachian Tube Dysfunction Questionnaire-7 (ETDQ-7). (3) Methods: Ninety-seven patients, ranging from 33 to 68 years old, were screened by skin tests and divided into atopic (G1) and non-atopic (G2). Eustachian tube function (ETF) was evaluated through tympanometry, William’s test and ETDQ-7. (4) Results: A moderate to severe subjective ETDQ-7 was found in the 35.42% of G1 and in the 22.45% of G2 patients before RTR. William’s test resulted normal in 141 ears (72.68%), partially impaired in 15 (7.73%), and grossly impaired in 38 (19.59%) before surgery. A grossly ETD was evidenced in the 19.59% of cases before surgery and decreased to 6.18% after surgery with a significant difference among atopic patients ( p < 0.001). (5) Conclusion: RTR may be considered a treatment option in patients suffering from ETD and inferior turbinates’ hypertrophy; RTR reduced the percentage of grossly impaired ET function ( p < 0.001). ETDQ-7 and William’s test may represent valuable tools to assess ET function before and after surgery.

Suggested Citation

  • Francesco Martines & Francesco Dispenza & Federico Sireci & Salvatore Gallina & Pietro Salvago, 2021. "Eustachian Tube Function Assessment after Radiofrequency Turbinate Reduction in Atopic and Non-Atopic Patients," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-11, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:3:p:881-:d:484030
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/3/881/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/3/881/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:3:p:881-:d:484030. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.