IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i3p1124-d488137.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

College Students’ Views on Functional, Interactive and Critical Nutrition Literacy: A Qualitative Study

Author

Listed:
  • Jade McNamara

    (School of Food and Agriculture, University of Maine Orono, Orono, ME 04469, USA)

  • Noereem Z. Mena

    (Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA)

  • Leigh Neptune

    (School of Food and Agriculture, University of Maine Orono, Orono, ME 04469, USA)

  • Kayla Parsons

    (School of Food and Agriculture, University of Maine Orono, Orono, ME 04469, USA)

Abstract

This research aimed to uncover how the nutrition literacy domains (functional, interactive, critical) influence the dietary decisions of young adults in college. For this qualitative study, undergraduate college students aged 18–24 years old ( n = 24) were recruited to participate in focus groups. The focus group transcripts were independently coded for primary and secondary themes using a grounded theory approach and a basic thematic analysis. Four focus groups with 5–7 participants per group were conducted. The three domains of nutrition literacy emerged in the focus groups with two themes per domain. Themes within functional nutrition literacy included ‘food enhances or inhibits good health’ and ‘components of a healthy diet’; themes within interactive nutrition literacy included ‘navigating the college food environment’ and ‘awareness of food marketing on dietary behavior’; themes within critical nutrition literacy included ‘critical appraisal of nutrition information’ and ‘awareness of societal barriers to good health’. Understanding how the different nutrition literacy domains relate to college students’ food choices can inform future researchers on how to appropriately assess nutrition literacy and design programs aimed at improving dietary behaviors of college students.

Suggested Citation

  • Jade McNamara & Noereem Z. Mena & Leigh Neptune & Kayla Parsons, 2021. "College Students’ Views on Functional, Interactive and Critical Nutrition Literacy: A Qualitative Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-12, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:3:p:1124-:d:488137
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/3/1124/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/3/1124/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rebecca L. Hagedorn & Jade A. White & Lisa Franzen-Castle & Sarah E. Colby & Kendra K. Kattelmann & Adrienne A. White & Melissa D. Olfert, 2018. "Teens Implementing a Childhood Obesity Prevention Program in the Community: Feasibility and Perceptions of a Partnership with HSTA and iCook 4-H," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-12, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bogdana Adriana Năsui & Rodica Ana Ungur & Patricia Talaba & Valentin Nicolae Varlas & Nina Ciuciuc & Cristina Alina Silaghi & Horatiu Silaghi & Dana Opre & Anca Lucia Pop, 2021. "Is Alcohol Consumption Related to Lifestyle Factors in Romanian University Students?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-16, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:3:p:1124-:d:488137. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.