IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i2p765-d482100.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Reliability of Pelvic Floor Muscle Bioelectrical Activity (sEMG) Assessment Using a Multi-Activity Measurement Protocol in Young Women

Author

Listed:
  • Łukasz Oleksy

    (Orthopaedic and Rehabilitation Department, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-091 Warsaw, Poland
    Oleksy Medical & Sports Sciences, 37-100 Łańcut, Poland)

  • Anna Mika

    (Institute of Clinical Rehabilitation, University of Physical Education in Kraków, Al. Jana Pawła II 78, 31-571 Krakow, Poland)

  • Iwona Sulowska-Daszyk

    (Institute of Clinical Rehabilitation, University of Physical Education in Kraków, Al. Jana Pawła II 78, 31-571 Krakow, Poland)

  • Ewelina Rosłoniec

    (Department of Physiotherapy, Poznań University of Physical Education, 66-400 Gorzów Wielkopolski, Poland)

  • Renata Kielnar

    (Institute of Health Sciences, Medical College of Rzeszów University, 35-315 Rzeszów, Poland)

  • Artur Stolarczyk

    (Orthopaedic and Rehabilitation Department, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-091 Warsaw, Poland)

Abstract

The aim of the study was to determine the between-trial and between-day reliability of the Glazer protocol and our multi-activity surface electromyography (sEMG) measurement protocol for pelvic floor muscle (PFM) evaluation. The bioelectrical activity of PFM was collected using an endovaginal electrode in 30 young, Caucasian, nulliparous women (age 22–27, 168.6 ± 5.1 cm, 57.1 ± 11.8 kg). The between-trial and between-day reliability of the original Glazer protocol and the new multi-activity sEMG protocol were assessed during the following phases: pre-baseline rest, phasic (flick) contractions, tonic contractions, endurance contraction, and post-baseline rest. The Glazer protocol was characterized by poor and moderate measurement reliability. The time-domain parameters for the rise and fall of the signal amplitude and median frequency showed poor between-trial and between-day reliability. The mean and peak amplitudes indicated mainly good between-trial and moderate between-days reliability. Our protocol showed moderate to excellent reliability of both time-domain and quantitative parameters of muscle recruitment. In our protocol, the frequency-domain parameters describing muscle fatigue demonstrated much higher reliability than in the case of the Glazer protocol. The most important information obtained in this study was the significant improvement of diagnostic validity in PFM bioelectrical activity evaluation. The higher reliability of our sEMG protocol compared to original Glazer protocol allowed us to suggest that protocol modifications and changes in sEMG signal processing methods were effective in the improvement of PFM assessment quality. The new parameters calculated from the sEMG signal proposed in our sEMG protocol allowed us to obtain additional clinically important information about PFM dysfunctions regarding specific deficits of muscle contraction such as decrease in muscle strength; endurance or coordination related to, e.g., stress urinary incontinence; or pelvic floor muscle imbalance after childbirth.

Suggested Citation

  • Łukasz Oleksy & Anna Mika & Iwona Sulowska-Daszyk & Ewelina Rosłoniec & Renata Kielnar & Artur Stolarczyk, 2021. "The Reliability of Pelvic Floor Muscle Bioelectrical Activity (sEMG) Assessment Using a Multi-Activity Measurement Protocol in Young Women," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-13, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:2:p:765-:d:482100
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/2/765/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/2/765/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:2:p:765-:d:482100. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.