IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i2p672-d480447.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perinatal Outcomes Associated with Latency in Late Preterm Premature Rupture of Membranes

Author

Listed:
  • Eui Kyung Choi

    (Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul 02841, Korea)

  • So Yeon Kim

    (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul 02841, Korea)

  • Ji-Man Heo

    (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul 02841, Korea)

  • Kyu Hee Park

    (Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul 02841, Korea)

  • Ho Yeon Kim

    (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul 02841, Korea)

  • Byung Min Choi

    (Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul 02841, Korea)

  • Hai-Joong Kim

    (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul 02841, Korea)

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the perinatal outcomes of preterm premature rupture of membrane (PPROM) with latency periods at 33 + 0–36 + 6 weeks of gestation. This retrospective case-control study included women with singleton pregnancies who delivered at 33 + 0–36 + 6 weeks at Korea University Ansan Hospital in South Korea between 2006–2019. The maternal and neonatal characteristics were compared between different latency periods (expectant delivery ≥72 h vs. immediate delivery <72 h). Data were compared among 345 women (expectant, n = 39; immediate delivery, n = 306). There was no significant difference in maternal and neonatal morbidities between the groups, despite the younger gestational age in the expectant delivery group. Stratified by gestational weeks, the 34-week infants showed a statistically significant lower exposure to antenatal steroids (73.4% vs. 20.0%, p < 0.001), while the incidence of respiratory distress syndrome (12.8%) and the use of any respiratory support (36.8%) was higher than those in the 33-week infants, without significance. Our study shows that a prolonged latency period (≥72 h) did not increase maternal and neonatal morbidities, and a considerable number of preterm infants immediately delivered at 34 weeks experienced respiratory complications. Expectant management and antenatal corticosteroids should be considered in late preterm infants with PPROM.

Suggested Citation

  • Eui Kyung Choi & So Yeon Kim & Ji-Man Heo & Kyu Hee Park & Ho Yeon Kim & Byung Min Choi & Hai-Joong Kim, 2021. "Perinatal Outcomes Associated with Latency in Late Preterm Premature Rupture of Membranes," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-9, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:2:p:672-:d:480447
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/2/672/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/2/672/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David P van der Ham & Sylvia M C Vijgen & Jan G Nijhuis & Johannes J van Beek & Brent C Opmeer & Antonius L M Mulder & Rob Moonen & Mariët Groenewout & Mariëlle G van Pampus & Gerald D Mantel & Kitty , 2012. "Induction of Labor versus Expectant Management in Women with Preterm Prelabor Rupture of Membranes between 34 and 37 Weeks: A Randomized Controlled Trial," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(4), pages 1-16, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:2:p:672-:d:480447. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.