IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i2p541-d478206.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Changes in Psychoacoustic Recognition and Brain Activity by Types of Fire Alarm

Author

Listed:
  • Sunghwa You

    (Laboratory of Hearing and Technology, Research Institute of Audiology and Speech Pathology, College of Natural Sciences, Hallym University, Chuncheon 24252, Korea)

  • Woojae Han

    (Laboratory of Hearing and Technology, Research Institute of Audiology and Speech Pathology, College of Natural Sciences, Hallym University, Chuncheon 24252, Korea
    Division of Speech Pathology and Audiology, College of Natural Sciences, Hallym University, Chuncheon 24252, Korea)

  • Han-Jin Jang

    (Department of Digital Contents, School of Digital Contents Convergence, Hallym University, Chuncheon 24252, Korea)

  • Ghee-Young Noh

    (School of Media Communication, Hallym University, Chuncheon 24252, Korea)

Abstract

In public, the role of a fire alarm is to induce a person to a certain recognition of potential danger, resulting in that person taking appropriate evacuation action. Unfortunately, the sound of the fire alarm is not internationally standardized yet, except for recommending the use of a signal with a regular temporal pattern (or T-3 pattern). To identify the effective alarm sound, the present study investigated a relationship between acoustic characteristics of the fire alarm and its subjective psychoacoustic recognition and objective electroencephalography (EEG) responses for 50 young and older listeners. As the stimuli, six different types of alarms were applied: bell, slow whoop, T-3 520 Hz, T-3 3100 Hz, and two simulated T-3 sounds (i.e., 520 and 3100 Hz) to which older adults with age-related hearing loss seemed to hear. While listening to the sounds, the EEG was recorded by each individual. The psychoacoustic recognition was also evaluated by using a questionnaire consisting of three subcategories, i.e., arousal, urgency, and immersion. The subjective responses resulted in a statistically significant difference between the types of sound. In particular, the fire alarms had acoustic features of high frequency or gradually increased frequencies such as T-3 3100 Hz, bell, and slow whoop, representing effective sounds to induce high arousal and urgency, although they also showed a limitation in being widely transmitted and vulnerable to background noise environment. Interestingly, there was a meaningful interaction effect between the sounds and age groups for the urgency and immersion, indicating that the bell was quite highly recognized in older adults. In general, EEG data showed that alpha power was decreased and gamma power was increased in all sounds, which means a relationship with negative emotions such as high arousal and urgency. Based on the current findings, we suggest using fire alarm sounds with acoustic features of high frequencies in indoor and/or public places.

Suggested Citation

  • Sunghwa You & Woojae Han & Han-Jin Jang & Ghee-Young Noh, 2021. "Changes in Psychoacoustic Recognition and Brain Activity by Types of Fire Alarm," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-23, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:2:p:541-:d:478206
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/2/541/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/2/541/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chanbeom Kwak & Woojae Han, 2021. "Age-Related Difficulty of Listening Effort in Elderly," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-14, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:2:p:541-:d:478206. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.