IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i24p13338-d705431.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Death Notification in Italian Critical Care Unites and Emergency Services. A Qualitative Study with Physicians, Nurses and Relatives

Author

Listed:
  • Ines Testoni

    (Department of Philosophy, Sociology, Pedagogy and Applied Psychology (FISPPA), University of Padova, 35122 Padova, Italy
    Emili Sagol Creative Arts Therapies Research Center, University of Haifa, Haifa 3498838, Israel)

  • Erika Iacona

    (Department of Philosophy, Sociology, Pedagogy and Applied Psychology (FISPPA), University of Padova, 35122 Padova, Italy)

  • Lorenza Palazzo

    (Department of Philosophy, Sociology, Pedagogy and Applied Psychology (FISPPA), University of Padova, 35122 Padova, Italy)

  • Beatrice Barzizza

    (Department of Philosophy, Sociology, Pedagogy and Applied Psychology (FISPPA), University of Padova, 35122 Padova, Italy)

  • Beatrice Baldrati

    (Department of Philosophy, Sociology, Pedagogy and Applied Psychology (FISPPA), University of Padova, 35122 Padova, Italy)

  • Davide Mazzon

    (Department of Philosophy, Sociology, Pedagogy and Applied Psychology (FISPPA), University of Padova, 35122 Padova, Italy)

  • Paolo Navalesi

    (Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy
    Department of Surgery and Medicine, University of Padua, 35128 Padova, Italy)

  • Giovanni Mistraletti

    (Department of Medical-Surgical Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milano, 20142 Milano, Italy)

  • Diego De Leo

    (Australian Institute for Suicide Research and Prevention, Griffith University, Brisbane 4122, Australia)

Abstract

This qualitative study was conducted in critical care units and emergency services and was aimed at considering the death notification (DN) phenomenology among physicians (notifiers), patient relatives (receivers) and those who work between them (nurses). Through the qualitative method, a systemic perspective was adopted to recognise three different categories of representation: 23 clinicians, 13 nurses and 11 family members of COVID-19 victims were interviewed, totalling 47 people from all over Italy (25 females, mean age: 46,36; SD: 10,26). With respect to notifiers, the following themes emerged: the changes in the relational dimension, protective factors and difficulties related to DN. With respect to receivers, the hospital was perceived as a prison, bereavement between DN, lost rituals and continuing bonds. Among nurses, changes in the relational dimension, protective factors and the impact of the death. Some common issues between physicians and nurses were relational difficulties in managing distancing and empathy and the support of relatives and colleagues. The perspective of receivers showed suffering related to loss and health care professionals’ inefficacy in communication. Specifically, everyone considered DNs mismanaged because of the COVID-19 emergency. Some considerations inherent in death education for DN management among health professionals were presented.

Suggested Citation

  • Ines Testoni & Erika Iacona & Lorenza Palazzo & Beatrice Barzizza & Beatrice Baldrati & Davide Mazzon & Paolo Navalesi & Giovanni Mistraletti & Diego De Leo, 2021. "Death Notification in Italian Critical Care Unites and Emergency Services. A Qualitative Study with Physicians, Nurses and Relatives," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(24), pages 1-12, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:24:p:13338-:d:705431
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/24/13338/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/24/13338/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:24:p:13338-:d:705431. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.