IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i24p13219-d703050.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Association of Dental and Prosthetic Status with Oral Health-Related Quality of Life in Centenarians

Author

Listed:
  • Caroline Sekundo

    (Department of Conservative Dentistry, Clinic for Oral, Dental and Maxillofacial Diseases, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany)

  • Eva Langowski

    (Department of Conservative Dentistry, Clinic for Oral, Dental and Maxillofacial Diseases, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany)

  • Samuel Kilian

    (Institute of Medical Biometry, University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany)

  • Diana Wolff

    (Department of Conservative Dentistry, Clinic for Oral, Dental and Maxillofacial Diseases, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany)

  • Andreas Zenthöfer

    (Department of Prosthodontics, Clinic for Oral, Dental and Maxillofacial Diseases, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany)

  • Cornelia Frese

    (Department of Conservative Dentistry, Clinic for Oral, Dental and Maxillofacial Diseases, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany)

Abstract

To date, there is little evidence on centenarians’ dental and prosthetic status or their oral-health-related quality of life (OHRQoL). Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess possible associations between sociodemographic and oral health factors, including prosthetic needs in this special age group and their potential influence on OHRQoL. Persons born before 1920 were recruited from population registries in south-western Germany. Fifty-five centenarians participated and underwent a comprehensive oral examination. Cognitive capacity was evaluated using the short Mini-Mental State Examination (S-MMSE, max. 21 points). At an S-MMSE > 10, an analysis of OHRQoL by means of the Geriatric Oral Health Assessment Index (max. ADD-GOHAI score 60 points) was performed (n = 43). Bivariate statistics and a linear regression model were used after variable selection to analyze data. Centenarians presented with a mean (SD) of 22 (7.2) missing teeth. Complete (65.5%) or partial dentures (21.8%) in at least one jaw were most common. One-third of the dentures needed repair/replacement; 16% of the centenarians presented with denture sores. In 60% of cases, OHRQoL was rated unsatisfactory (ADD-GOHAI < 57). Trouble biting or chewing resulted in the lowest levels of OHRQoL. Fewer remaining teeth, reduced functional capacity and removable prostheses correlated with an impaired OHRQoL (r s = −0.36, p = 0.01; r s = −0.34, p = 0.01; r s = −0.29, p = 0.03, respectively). After variable selection, the final linear regression model included only the number of missing teeth, the associated ADD-GOHAI score decreasing by 0.3 points per missing tooth. In conclusion, tooth loss and removable prostheses in need of repair or replacement are highly prevalent in centenarians. These factors seem to modulate OHRQoL negatively, assumedly due to impaired chewing function. Larger confirmatory studies are needed to validate these first results.

Suggested Citation

  • Caroline Sekundo & Eva Langowski & Samuel Kilian & Diana Wolff & Andreas Zenthöfer & Cornelia Frese, 2021. "Association of Dental and Prosthetic Status with Oral Health-Related Quality of Life in Centenarians," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(24), pages 1-11, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:24:p:13219-:d:703050
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/24/13219/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/24/13219/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:24:p:13219-:d:703050. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.