IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i24p13164-d701901.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Switzerland’s Narcotics Regulation Jungle: Off-Label Use, Counterfoil Prescriptions, and Opioid Agonist Therapy in the French-Speaking Cantons

Author

Listed:
  • Caroline Schmitt-Koopmann

    (Service of Addiction Medicine, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne, CH 1004 Lausanne, Switzerland)

  • Carole-Anne Baud

    (Faculty of Business and Economics, University of Lausanne, CH 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland)

  • Valérie Junod

    (Faculty of Business and Economics, University of Lausanne, CH 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland
    Faculty of Law, University of Geneva, CH 1211 Genève, Switzerland)

  • Olivier Simon

    (Service of Addiction Medicine, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne, CH 1004 Lausanne, Switzerland)

Abstract

The word “narcotic” is often first associated with “illicit drugs”. Yet, many “narcotic” and psychotropic substances are, in fact, medicines. Controlled medicines (CM) are products that meet the legal definition of both a “narcotic” under the Swiss Narcotics Act and of a medicine under the Therapeutic Products Act. We aim to examine how similar and how different, respectively, the implementation of CM regulations is throughout French-speaking Switzerland. Based on a legal analysis of the cantonal regulations, we conducted semi-structured interviews with cantonal pharmacists and cantonal physicians. We asked them how they perceive and implement the federal legal requirements. We find that some of these requirements have fallen into disuse, notably the federal duty to notify off-label use of CM. We observe that counterfoil prescriptions in their current paper format are a veritable data graveyard in the sense that they are not actively used to monitor or supervise the market. Moreover, we detect different conditions for opioid agonist treatment authorization. Some cantons require additional physicians’ training or written commitments by the person treated. Our mapping of the CM regulation implementation can serve as a basis for cantons to review their practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Caroline Schmitt-Koopmann & Carole-Anne Baud & Valérie Junod & Olivier Simon, 2021. "Switzerland’s Narcotics Regulation Jungle: Off-Label Use, Counterfoil Prescriptions, and Opioid Agonist Therapy in the French-Speaking Cantons," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(24), pages 1-11, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:24:p:13164-:d:701901
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/24/13164/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/24/13164/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:24:p:13164-:d:701901. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.