IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i24p12904-d697031.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of Dental Midline on Asymmetric Faces: Perspective of Laypersons and Dentists

Author

Listed:
  • Joana Meneses Martins

    (FCS, Universidade Fernando Pessoa, 4249-004 Porto, Portugal)

  • Liliana Gavinha Costa

    (FP-I3ID, FCS, Universidade Fernando Pessoa, 4249-004 Porto, Portugal)

  • Ana Lidia Carvalho

    (FCS, Universidade Fernando Pessoa, 4249-004 Porto, Portugal)

  • Maria Conceição Manso

    (FP-I3ID, FP-ENAS, FCS, Universidade Fernando Pessoa, 4249-004 Porto, Portugal)

  • Sandra Gavinha

    (FP-I3ID, FCS, Universidade Fernando Pessoa, 4249-004 Porto, Portugal)

  • Mariano Herrero-Climent

    (Porto Dental Institute, 4150-518 Porto, Portugal)

  • Blanca Ríos-Carrasco

    (Department of Periodontology, Universidad de Sevilla, 41009 Seville, Spain)

  • Carlos Falcão

    (FP-I3ID, FCS, Universidade Fernando Pessoa, 4249-004 Porto, Portugal
    Porto Dental Institute, 4150-518 Porto, Portugal)

  • Paulo Ribeiro

    (FP-I3ID, FCS, Universidade Fernando Pessoa, 4249-004 Porto, Portugal
    Porto Dental Institute, 4150-518 Porto, Portugal)

Abstract

Background: The objective was to determine if asymmetric facial features, nasal and chin deviations, affect the perception of attractiveness of a dental midline angulation, and if it is consistent among both dentists and laypeople. It was also analyzed if factors, such as the sex, age group of the participants and the dentist’s area of operation are relevant in their assessment. Methods: A cross-sectional study, approved by the Ethics Committee of Fernando Pessoa University. From a symmetrical facial model (SFM) image, a natural-looking asymmetrical face was created. Based on this asymmetric facial model six images were created, with different directions and degrees of inclination of the dental midline. In total, 236 laypersons and 242 dentists completed the online questionnaire where they rated the self-perception of attractiveness of the eight images (VAS scale from 0 to 10). Non-parametric comparisons (IBM© SPSS Statistics vs. 27.0, p < 0.05). Results: The results showed a significant difference in the perception of attractiveness between laypeople and dentists. This finding was consistent regarding every image, except for the SFM. The factors, sex of the people participating and dentist’s area of operation, seemed only to contribute to a significant difference in the perception when it came to the SFM. The perceived attractiveness of the images, for dentists and laypersons, did not differ by age group of the participant, apart from images 6 and 8. Conclusions: Dentists are more rigorous about dental midline inclinations than laypersons. The perception of attractiveness was affected by the age group and sex of the participants and the dentist’s area of operation.

Suggested Citation

  • Joana Meneses Martins & Liliana Gavinha Costa & Ana Lidia Carvalho & Maria Conceição Manso & Sandra Gavinha & Mariano Herrero-Climent & Blanca Ríos-Carrasco & Carlos Falcão & Paulo Ribeiro, 2021. "The Impact of Dental Midline on Asymmetric Faces: Perspective of Laypersons and Dentists," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(24), pages 1-13, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:24:p:12904-:d:697031
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/24/12904/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/24/12904/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:24:p:12904-:d:697031. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.