IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i24p12868-d696454.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of Content and Quality of Caribbean, International, and High-Income Country-Specific Clinical Guidelines for Managing Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Author

Listed:
  • Amy Latifah Nixon

    (Division of Epidemiology and Public Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK
    The Nottingham Centre for Evidence-Based Healthcare, A Joanna Briggs Institute Centre of Excellence, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK
    Co-first authors.)

  • Kaushik Chattopadhyay

    (Division of Epidemiology and Public Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK
    The Nottingham Centre for Evidence-Based Healthcare, A Joanna Briggs Institute Centre of Excellence, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK
    Co-first authors.)

  • Jo Leonardi-Bee

    (Division of Epidemiology and Public Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK
    The Nottingham Centre for Evidence-Based Healthcare, A Joanna Briggs Institute Centre of Excellence, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK)

Abstract

Purpose. Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is poorly managed in the Caribbean region; therefore, conducting an assessment on the content and quality of clinical guidelines could assist guideline developers in detecting and addressing information gaps. Hence, this study aimed to benchmark and compare the clinical guidelines for T2DM management from the Caribbean to guidelines developed internationally and by high-income countries. Methods. Seven T2DM management clinical guidelines were a priori selected from international and high-income country-specific clinical guidelines and then compared to the country-specific T2DM management clinical guidelines of the Caribbean region. Two reviewers independently assessed content (using a previously piloted data extraction form) and quality using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II) tool. Results. The Caribbean clinical guideline was found to contain similar levels of T2DM management topics when compared to international and high-income country-specific clinical guidelines; however, one country-specific clinical guideline from New Zealand was found to have substantially lower levels of content. The clinical guideline from the Caribbean was found to be of low quality and could not be used in practice; however, only three comparator clinical guidelines were found to be of high quality and could be recommended for use in clinical practice. A further three comparator clinical guidelines could be used in practice with minor modifications. Conclusion. Although the T2DM management clinical guidelines from the Caribbean region contained high levels of content with regards to relevant topics, it was of insufficient quality to be used in clinical practice. Therefore, an alternative high-quality clinical guideline, as identified within this study, should be adopted and used within the Caribbean region to manage T2DM until a high-quality region-specific clinical guideline can be developed.

Suggested Citation

  • Amy Latifah Nixon & Kaushik Chattopadhyay & Jo Leonardi-Bee, 2021. "Comparison of Content and Quality of Caribbean, International, and High-Income Country-Specific Clinical Guidelines for Managing Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(24), pages 1-13, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:24:p:12868-:d:696454
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/24/12868/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/24/12868/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:24:p:12868-:d:696454. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.