IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i23p12844-d695956.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Helpful and What Is the Quality of Digital Sources of Healthy Lifestyle Information Used by Australian Adolescents? A Mixed Methods Study

Author

Listed:
  • Matthew Armstrong

    (Engagement and Co-Design Research Hub, Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Westmead 2145, Australia
    Equal contribution.)

  • Nicole K. Halim

    (Engagement and Co-Design Research Hub, Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Westmead 2145, Australia
    Prevention Research Collaboration, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney 2006, Australia
    Equal contribution.)

  • Rebecca Raeside

    (Engagement and Co-Design Research Hub, Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Westmead 2145, Australia)

  • Si Si Jia

    (Engagement and Co-Design Research Hub, Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Westmead 2145, Australia)

  • Karice Hyun

    (Engagement and Co-Design Research Hub, Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Westmead 2145, Australia
    ANZAC Research Institute, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, The University of Sydney, Sydney 2137, Australia)

  • Farzaneh Boroumand

    (Engagement and Co-Design Research Hub, Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Westmead 2145, Australia
    ANZAC Research Institute, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, The University of Sydney, Sydney 2137, Australia)

  • Mariam Mandoh

    (Engagement and Co-Design Research Hub, Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Westmead 2145, Australia)

  • Anna C. Singleton

    (Engagement and Co-Design Research Hub, Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Westmead 2145, Australia)

  • Philayrath Phongsavan

    (Prevention Research Collaboration, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney 2006, Australia
    Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney 2006, Australia)

  • Julie Redfern

    (Engagement and Co-Design Research Hub, Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Westmead 2145, Australia
    The George Institute for Global Health, The University of New South Wales, Sydney 2006, Australia)

  • Stephanie R. Partridge

    (Engagement and Co-Design Research Hub, Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Westmead 2145, Australia
    Prevention Research Collaboration, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney 2006, Australia
    Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney 2006, Australia)

Abstract

To evaluate the digital platforms most used by adolescents for healthy lifestyle information, perceived helpfulness of platform information, helpfulness for positive behaviour changes, and quality of platforms’ lifestyle health information. Mixed-methods study including a cross-sectional online survey and content analysis. Eligible participants were 13–18-years; living in Australia; and had searched online for healthy lifestyle behaviour (nutrition, physical activity, weight management, sleep) information in the previous three months. Survey items examined the use of digital platforms, self-perceived helpfulness, usefulness for positive behaviour, and popular content. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and ordinal logistic regression models. Content analysis was performed on popular digital content to evaluate expertise, objectivity, transparency, popularity, and relevance. In total, 297 participants completed the survey (62.3% female; 15.8 [SD1.5] years). Seventy-eight percent and 77% of participants reported using websites and social media, respectively, for seeking healthy lifestyle information. Websites and social media were rated as somewhat helpful by 43% and 46% of participants, respectively. Sixty-six percent and 53% of participants agreed/strongly agreed smartphone apps and social media were helpful for positive behaviour change, respectively. Helpfulness did not differ by age or gender. We evaluated 582 popular digital content; 38% were produced by a commercial company. Only 7% of content was from health organisations, 10% from health professionals and only 10% of content was objective, and 14% was transparent. Adolescents extensively utilise websites and social media for health information, yet popular content has limited objectivity and transparency. Governments and health organisations should consider creating age-appropriate digital information for healthy lifestyle behaviours.

Suggested Citation

  • Matthew Armstrong & Nicole K. Halim & Rebecca Raeside & Si Si Jia & Karice Hyun & Farzaneh Boroumand & Mariam Mandoh & Anna C. Singleton & Philayrath Phongsavan & Julie Redfern & Stephanie R. Partridg, 2021. "How Helpful and What Is the Quality of Digital Sources of Healthy Lifestyle Information Used by Australian Adolescents? A Mixed Methods Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-14, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:23:p:12844-:d:695956
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/23/12844/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/23/12844/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:23:p:12844-:d:695956. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.