IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i23p12303-d685887.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Knowledge and Attitude of Saudi Students towards Plagiarism—A Cross-Sectional Survey Study

Author

Listed:
  • Rakhi Issrani

    (Department of Preventive Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Jouf University, Sakaka 72341, Saudi Arabia)

  • Abdulrahman Alduraywish

    (Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Jouf University, Sakaka 72341, Saudi Arabia)

  • Namdeo Prabhu

    (Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery and Diagnostic Sciences, College of Dentistry, Jouf University, Sakaka 72341, Saudi Arabia)

  • Mohammad Khursheed Alam

    (Department of Preventive Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Jouf University, Sakaka 72341, Saudi Arabia)

  • Rehana Basri

    (Neurology Division, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Jouf University, Sakaka 72341, Saudi Arabia)

  • Fahad Muqbil Aljohani

    (Aja Primary Health Care Centre, Ministry of Health, Hail 55471, Saudi Arabia)

  • Mshari Ali Abdullah Alolait

    (Safad Dental Center, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia)

  • Alaa Yahya Ali Alghamdi

    (Badanh Primary Health Care Centre, Arar 91431, Saudi Arabia)

  • Modhi Mohammed Nasser Alfawzan

    (Aja Primary Health Care Centre, Ministry of Health, Hail 55471, Saudi Arabia)

  • Abdullah Hamdan Mashog Alruwili

    (Ministry of Health, Sakaka 42421, Saudi Arabia)

Abstract

Background: Plagiarism (Plg) is an unacceptable practice since it affects the integrity of scientific literature. Aim and objectives: To seek students’ knowledge and attitude regarding Plg and solicit suggestions to prevent Plg in our institute. The specific objectives of the study were to ascertain whether students’ knowledge and attitudes about Plg differ by their demographic characteristics and academic years. Methodology: A 32 item questionnaire was given to all the undergraduate (UG) students of the College of Medicine and Dentistry, Jouf University, KSA. The research questions focused on demographic information, knowledge and attitude regarding Plg, and suggestions to curb Plg. Results: A total of 134 UG students filled out the survey. The samples consisted of 97 males and 37 females. Most of the students displayed adequate knowledge regarding Plg in terms of copying words or ideas, quoting references, and copying words without changing the matter. As compared to female students, male students had better awareness regarding meaningful and harmful effects of practicing Plg ( p < 0.05). Additionally, our results indicate that as students climb the academic ladder, their awareness on Plg tends to rise. Common reasons for plagiarizing are discussed here together with suggestions to combat Plg. Conclusion: The results of this study can be mainly taken as an eye opener which demonstrates the vital factors pertaining to the level of students’ knowledge about Plg, and to eradicate the problem, there is a need for more discussions and training on this topic for students.

Suggested Citation

  • Rakhi Issrani & Abdulrahman Alduraywish & Namdeo Prabhu & Mohammad Khursheed Alam & Rehana Basri & Fahad Muqbil Aljohani & Mshari Ali Abdullah Alolait & Alaa Yahya Ali Alghamdi & Modhi Mohammed Nasser, 2021. "Knowledge and Attitude of Saudi Students towards Plagiarism—A Cross-Sectional Survey Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-10, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:23:p:12303-:d:685887
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/23/12303/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/23/12303/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Saeed Ahmad & Ahsan Ullah, 2015. "Self-Assessment of the Use of Plagiarism Avoiding Techniques to Create Ethical Scholarship Among Research Students," International Journal of Management, Knowledge and Learning, International School for Social and Business Studies, Celje, Slovenia, vol. 4(2), pages 257-270.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:23:p:12303-:d:685887. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.