IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i21p11729-d674732.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Preliminary Evaluation of the Unified Protocol among Trauma-Exposed Adults with and without PTSD

Author

Listed:
  • Caitlyn O. Hood

    (Department of Psychology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506, USA)

  • Matthew W. Southward

    (Department of Psychology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506, USA)

  • Christian Bugher

    (Department of Psychology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506, USA)

  • Shannon Sauer-Zavala

    (Department of Psychology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506, USA)

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether the Unified Protocol (UP)—a mechanistically transdiagnostic psychological treatment—provides benefit to individuals with a range of trauma histories, psychological difficulties, and diagnostic comorbidity. Using data from a sequential multiple-assignment randomized trial (SMART), this exploratory analysis included a sample of 69 community-recruited adults seeking outpatient mental health treatment. We examined reductions in anxiety and depressive symptoms and changes in aversive and avoidant reactions to intense emotions—the UP’s putative mechanism—first by comparing individuals with and without trauma histories and then specifically among participants with PTSD. Findings suggest that the UP may lead to similar improvements in clinical diagnostic severity, anxiety, and depression among patients with trauma exposure as those without trauma exposure. Roughly half of participants with PTSD demonstrated reductions in PTSD clinical severity, anxiety, depression, and distress aversion, suggesting the UP may be an efficacious treatment for people with PTSD and comorbid conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Caitlyn O. Hood & Matthew W. Southward & Christian Bugher & Shannon Sauer-Zavala, 2021. "A Preliminary Evaluation of the Unified Protocol among Trauma-Exposed Adults with and without PTSD," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-12, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:21:p:11729-:d:674732
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/21/11729/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/21/11729/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:21:p:11729-:d:674732. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.