IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i21p11632-d673010.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Lifestyle Medicine Reimbursement: A Proposal for Policy Priorities Informed by a Cross-Sectional Survey of Lifestyle Medicine Practitioners

Author

Listed:
  • Kelly J. Freeman

    (Department of Member Engagement & Administration, American College of Lifestyle Medicine, Chesterfield, MO 63006, USA
    Health Policy & Management, Indiana University Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA)

  • Meagan L. Grega

    (Department of Lifestyle Medicine, Kellyn Foundation, Tatamy, PA 18015, USA)

  • Susan M. Friedman

    (School of Medicine and Dentistry, Department of Medicine, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14642, USA)

  • Padmaja M. Patel

    (American College of Lifestyle Medicine, Chesterfield, MO 63006, USA
    Lifestyle Medicine Center, Midland Health, Midland, TX 79703, USA)

  • Ron W. Stout

    (Ardmore Institute of Health, Ardmore, OK 73401, USA)

  • Thomas M. Campbell

    (Department of Family Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY 14642, USA)

  • Michelle L. Tollefson

    (Department of Health Professions, Lifestyle Medicine Program, Metropolitan State University of Denver, Denver, CO 80204, USA)

  • Liana S. Lianov

    (American College of Lifestyle Medicine, Chesterfield, MO 63006, USA
    Global Positive Health Institute, Sacramento, CA 95825, USA)

  • Kaitlyn R. Pauly

    (Department of Member Engagement & Administration, American College of Lifestyle Medicine, Chesterfield, MO 63006, USA)

  • Kathryn J. Pollard

    (Department of Research, American College of Lifestyle Medicine, Chesterfield, MO 63006, USA)

  • Micaela C. Karlsen

    (Department of Research, American College of Lifestyle Medicine, Chesterfield, MO 63006, USA)

Abstract

Lifestyle medicine (LM) is a rapidly emerging clinical discipline that focuses on intensive therapeutic lifestyle changes to treat chronic disease, often producing dramatic health benefits. In spite of these well-documented benefits of LM approaches to provide evidence-based care that follows current clinical guidelines, LM practitioners have found reimbursement challenging. The objectives of this paper are to present the results of a cross-sectional survey of LM practitioners regarding lifestyle medicine reimbursement and to propose policy priorities related to the ability of practitioners to implement and achieve reimbursement for these necessary services. Results from a closed, online survey in 2019 were analyzed, with a total of n = 857 included in this analysis. Results were descriptively analyzed. This manuscript articulates policy proposals informed by the survey results. The study sample was 58% female, with median age of 51. A minority of the sample (17%) reported that all their practice was LM, while 56% reported that some of their practice was LM. A total of 55% of practitioners reported not being able to receive reimbursement for LM practice. Of those survey respondents who provided an answer to the question of what would make the practice of LM easier ( n = 471), the following suggestions were offered: reimbursement overall (18%), reimbursement for more time spent with patients (17%), more support from leadership (16%), policy measures to incentivize health (13%), education in LM for practitioners (11%), LM-specific billing codes and billing knowledge along with better electronic medical record (EMR) capabilities and streamlined reporting/paperwork (11%), and reimbursement for the extended care team (10%). Proposed policy changes focus on three areas of focus: (1) support for the care process using a LM approach, (2) reimbursement emphasizing outcomes of health, patient experience, and delivering person-centered care, and (3) incentivizing treatment that produces disease remission/reversal. Rectifying reimbursement barriers to lifestyle medicine practice will require a sustained effort from health systems and policy makers. The urgency of this transition towards lifestyle medicine interventions to effectively address the epidemic of chronic diseases in a way that can significantly improve outcomes is being hindered by current reimbursement policies and models.

Suggested Citation

  • Kelly J. Freeman & Meagan L. Grega & Susan M. Friedman & Padmaja M. Patel & Ron W. Stout & Thomas M. Campbell & Michelle L. Tollefson & Liana S. Lianov & Kaitlyn R. Pauly & Kathryn J. Pollard & Micael, 2021. "Lifestyle Medicine Reimbursement: A Proposal for Policy Priorities Informed by a Cross-Sectional Survey of Lifestyle Medicine Practitioners," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-16, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:21:p:11632-:d:673010
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/21/11632/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/21/11632/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Moaven Razavi & Stephen Fournier & Donald S Shepard & Grant Ritter & Gail K Strickler & William B Stason, 2014. "Effects of Lifestyle Modification Programs on Cardiac Risk Factors," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(12), pages 1-16, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rosália Páscoa & Andreia Teixeira & Micaela Gregório & Rosa Carvalho & Carlos Martins, 2021. "Patients’ Perspectives about Lifestyle Behaviors and Health in the Context of Family Medicine: A Cross-Sectional Study in Portugal," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-21, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:21:p:11632-:d:673010. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.