IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i21p11517-d670432.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Comparative Analysis of the Perception of Cancer Patients and Healthcare Providers (Oncology Physicians, Nurses, Social Workers) in Support of Integrated Community-Linked Cancer Plans

Author

Listed:
  • Young Ae Kim

    (National Cancer Center, National Cancer Control Institute, Goyang-si 10408, Gyeonggi-do, Korea)

  • Min Gee Choi

    (National Cancer Center, National Cancer Control Institute, Goyang-si 10408, Gyeonggi-do, Korea)

  • E Hwa Yun

    (National Cancer Center, Division of Cancer Registration & Surveillance, Goyang-si 10408, Gyeonggi-do, Korea)

  • So-Youn Jung

    (Cancer Healthcare Research Branch, National Cancer Center, Goyang-si 10408, Gyeonggi-do, Korea)

  • Ah Kyung Park

    (Social Work Team, National Cancer Center, Goyang-si 10408, Gyeonggi-do, Korea)

  • Hye Ri Choi

    (National Cancer Center, National Cancer Control Institute, Goyang-si 10408, Gyeonggi-do, Korea)

  • Yoon Jung Chang

    (National Cancer Center, National Cancer Control Institute, Goyang-si 10408, Gyeonggi-do, Korea)

Abstract

This study aimed to examine the awareness and status of cancer patients and healthcare providers (physicians, nurses and social workers) regarding community linkage, in order to establish a desirable care plan model in a future research project. The survey was conducted via two methods: face-to-face for cancer patients ( n = 308) and oncology physicians ( n = 210), and due to COVID-19 circumstances, online for nurses ( n = 200) and social workers ( n = 313). As a result, more than 95% of the healthcare providers responded that cancer patients required community-linked services and discharge plans, whereas 50.7% and 79.2% of cancer patients noted the importance of community-linked services and discharge plans, respectively. Social workers, among healthcare providers, showed the most positive experience about connecting patients to community services since 69.7% of them responded as “excellent”. However, as a group, cancer patients considered the necessity of community-linked service as less important, as only 50.7% responded as agreeing it was necessary. The barriers to community linkage were the lack of communication among the different professions of healthcare providers, and the ambiguity in their roles. The findings of this study will inform future community-linked health research, policies and systems for cancer patients. In particular, an in-depth interview with cancer patients will be required to explore their lack of acknowledgment about the necessity of community-linked services. Therefore, this study is expected to contribute to the improvement and supplementation of cancer policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Young Ae Kim & Min Gee Choi & E Hwa Yun & So-Youn Jung & Ah Kyung Park & Hye Ri Choi & Yoon Jung Chang, 2021. "A Comparative Analysis of the Perception of Cancer Patients and Healthcare Providers (Oncology Physicians, Nurses, Social Workers) in Support of Integrated Community-Linked Cancer Plans," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-9, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:21:p:11517-:d:670432
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/21/11517/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/21/11517/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Joo Young Kim & Mison Chun & Sang-Won Kim & Joonsup Song, 2020. "Identification of Korean cancer survivors’ unmet needs and desired psychosocial assistance: A focus group study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(1), pages 1-11, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Eun Young Park & Min Kyung Song & Mi Young An, 2023. "Experiences of Forest Healing Instructors Who Met Cancer Patients in Forest Healing Programs: FGI Research," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-12, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:21:p:11517-:d:670432. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.