Author
Listed:
- Maria Sammut
(School of Health Sciences, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, University of New-Castle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia)
- Kirsti Haracz
(School of Health Sciences, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, University of New-Castle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia)
- Coralie English
(School of Health Sciences, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, University of New-Castle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia
Priority Research Centre for Stroke and Brain Injury, Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW 2308, Australia)
- David Shakespeare
(School of Health Sciences, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, University of New-Castle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia)
- Gary Crowfoot
(School of Nursing and Midwifery, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia)
- Michael Nilsson
(School of Health Sciences, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, University of New-Castle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia
Centre for Rehab Innovations, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia)
- Heidi Janssen
(School of Health Sciences, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, University of New-Castle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia
Priority Research Centre for Stroke and Brain Injury, Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW 2308, Australia
Hunter New England Local Health District, Community and Aged Care Services Community Stroke Team, New Lambton Heights, NSW 2308, Australia)
Abstract
People who have had a transient ischemic attack (TIA) or mild stroke have a high risk of recurrent stroke. Secondary prevention programs providing support for meeting physical activity recommendations may reduce this risk. Most evidence for the feasibility and effectiveness of secondary stroke prevention arises from programs developed and tested in research institute settings with limited evidence for the acceptability of programs in ‘real world’ community settings. This qualitative descriptive study explored perceptions of participation in a secondary stroke prevention program (delivered by a community-based multidisciplinary health service team within a community gym) by adults with TIA or mild stroke. Data gathered via phone-based semi-structured interviews midway through the program, and at the end of the program, were analyzed using constructivist grounded theory methods. A total of 51 interviews from 30 participants produced two concepts. The first concept, “What it offered me”, describes critical elements that shape participants’ experience of the program. The second concept, “What I got out of it” describes perceived benefits of program participation. Participants perceived that experiences with peers in a health professional-led group program, held within a community-based gym, supported their goal of changing behaviour. Including these elements during the development of health service strategies to reduce recurrent stroke risk may strengthen program acceptability and subsequent effectiveness.
Suggested Citation
Maria Sammut & Kirsti Haracz & Coralie English & David Shakespeare & Gary Crowfoot & Michael Nilsson & Heidi Janssen, 2021.
"Participants’ Perspective of Engaging in a Gym-Based Health Service Delivered Secondary Stroke Prevention Program after TIA or Mild Stroke,"
IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-16, October.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:21:p:11448-:d:669030
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:21:p:11448-:d:669030. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.