IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i21p11444-d668980.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects of 1 MHz Therapeutic Ultrasound on Limb Blood Flow and Microvascular Reactivity: A Randomized Pilot Trial

Author

Listed:
  • Megan Waters

    (Doctor of Physical Therapy Program, College of Health Sciences, The University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, TX 79968, USA
    These two authors contributed equally to the completion of this manuscript.)

  • Branko Miljkovic

    (Doctor of Physical Therapy Program, College of Health Sciences, The University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, TX 79968, USA
    These two authors contributed equally to the completion of this manuscript.)

  • Jozelyn Rascon

    (Doctor of Physical Therapy Program, College of Health Sciences, The University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, TX 79968, USA
    Clinical Applied Physiology Laboratory, College of Health Sciences, The University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, TX 79902, USA)

  • Manuel Gomez

    (Clinical Applied Physiology Laboratory, College of Health Sciences, The University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, TX 79902, USA)

  • Alvaro N. Gurovich

    (Doctor of Physical Therapy Program, College of Health Sciences, The University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, TX 79968, USA
    Clinical Applied Physiology Laboratory, College of Health Sciences, The University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, TX 79902, USA)

Abstract

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over study where continuous therapeutic ultrasound (CUS; at 0.4 W/cm 2 ), pulsed therapeutic ultrasound (PUS; at 20% duty cycle, 0.08 W/cm 2 ), both at 1 MHz, and placebo (equipment on, no energy provided) were randomized and applied over the forearm of the non-dominant arm for 5 min in 10 young, healthy individuals. Absolute and peak forearm blood flow (FBF) were measured via Venous Occlusion Plethysmography. FBF was measured before, halfway, and after (immediately and 5 min after) the therapeutic ultrasound (TUS) intervention. Post-ischemic peak FBF was measured 10 min before and 10 min after the TUS intervention. A two-way repeated measures ANOVA (group × time) was selected to assess differences in FBF before, during, and after TUS treatment, and for peak FBF before and after TUS treatment. FBF increased 5 min after TUS in CUS compared to placebo (2.96 ± 1.04 vs. 2.09 ± 0.63 mL/min/100 mL of tissue, p < 0.05). PUS resulted in the greatest increase in Peak FBF at 10 min after US (Δ = 3.96 ± 2.02 mL/min/100 mL of tissue, p = 0.06). CUS at 1 MHz was an effective treatment modality for increasing FBF up to 5 min after intervention, but PUS resulted in the greatest increase in peak FBF at 10 min after intervention.

Suggested Citation

  • Megan Waters & Branko Miljkovic & Jozelyn Rascon & Manuel Gomez & Alvaro N. Gurovich, 2021. "Effects of 1 MHz Therapeutic Ultrasound on Limb Blood Flow and Microvascular Reactivity: A Randomized Pilot Trial," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-9, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:21:p:11444-:d:668980
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/21/11444/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/21/11444/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:21:p:11444-:d:668980. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.