IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i21p11405-d668237.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Clinical and Biomechanical Progression after Ankle Joint Distraction in a Young Adolescent Patient with Haemophilia

Author

Listed:
  • Nicolas Haelewijn

    (Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation Research Group, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven, Spoorwegstraat 12, B-8200 Brugge, Belgium)

  • Sebastien Lobet

    (Service D’hématologie, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Avenue Hippocrate 10, B-1200 Bruxelles, Belgium
    Neuromusculoskeletal Lab (NMSK), Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, Université Catholique de Louvain, Secteur des Sciences de la Santé, Avenue Mounier 53, B-1200 Brussels, Belgium
    Secteur de Kinésithérapie, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Avenue Hippocrate 10, B-1200 Brussels, Belgium)

  • An Van Damme

    (Service D’hématologie Pédiatrique, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Avenue Hippocrate 10, B-1200 Bruxelles, Belgium)

  • Pierre-Louis Docquier

    (Service D’orthopédie et de Traumatologie, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Avenue Hippocrate 10, B-1200 Bruxelles, Belgium)

  • Maarten Eerdekens

    (Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation Research Group, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven, Spoorwegstraat 12, B-8200 Brugge, Belgium)

  • Kevin Deschamps

    (Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation Research Group, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven, Spoorwegstraat 12, B-8200 Brugge, Belgium
    Haute Ecole Leonard De Vinci, Institut D’Enseignement Supérieur Parnasse Deux-Alice, Division of Podiatry, Avenue E. Mounier 84, B-1200 Sint-Lambrechts-Woluwe, Belgium
    Department of Podiatry, Artevelde University of Applied Sciences, Voetweg 66, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium)

Abstract

Ankle joint distraction (AJD) has been described to be a valuable joint-sparing alternative to arthrodesis or arthroplasty; however, clinical endpoints associated to this surgical intervention are lacking. The current case report describes clinical and biomechanical outcome measures of ankle joint distraction in a 14-year-old patient with severe haemophilia A. Because of persistent and incapacitating pain and the poor response to conservative and invasive treatment options, ankle joint distraction was performed in this 14-year-old patient using an external fixator encompassing two Ilizarov full rings in the tibia and a foot ring fixed to the foot by four K-wires. State-of-the-art medical imaging and non-invasive skin marker-based 3D multi-segment foot modelling were performed in a pre- and post-operative stage. From a structural viewpoint, this AJD was a success since it improved and stabilised the osteo-cartilaginous lesions of the ankle. Biomechanical outcome measures associated with the 18-month follow-up were found to be suboptimal, showing an early plantarflexion pattern at the ankle joint during midstance and a tendency towards increased power absorption at the midfoot with peak power absorption being almost two times higher when compared to boys of the same age. From a functional viewpoint, we observed a clear reduction in the patients’ physical activities until one year after AJD. Despite these functional and structural improvements, recurrent painful phenomena, including the development of a complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) and a stress fracture of the third metatarsal bone, were observed which are probably related with the development of recurrent subchondral oedema.

Suggested Citation

  • Nicolas Haelewijn & Sebastien Lobet & An Van Damme & Pierre-Louis Docquier & Maarten Eerdekens & Kevin Deschamps, 2021. "Clinical and Biomechanical Progression after Ankle Joint Distraction in a Young Adolescent Patient with Haemophilia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-7, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:21:p:11405-:d:668237
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/21/11405/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/21/11405/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:21:p:11405-:d:668237. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.