IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i21p11343-d667133.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Tele-Yoga in Long Term Illness–Protocol for a Randomised Controlled Trial Including a Process Evaluation and Results from a Pilot Study

Author

Listed:
  • Anna Strömberg

    (Department of Health Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, 581 83 Linköping, Sweden
    Department of Cardiology, Linköping University, 581 85 Linköping, Sweden)

  • Ingela Thylén

    (Department of Health Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, 581 83 Linköping, Sweden
    Department of Cardiology, Linköping University, 581 85 Linköping, Sweden)

  • Lotti Orwelius

    (Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Linköping University, 581 85 Linköping, Sweden
    Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, 581 83 Linköping, Sweden)

  • Leonie Klompstra

    (Department of Health Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, 581 83 Linköping, Sweden)

  • Tiny Jaarsma

    (Department of Health Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, 581 83 Linköping, Sweden)

Abstract

Background: For people with long-term illness, debilitated by severe symptoms, it can be difficult to attend regular yoga classes. We have therefore developed a tele-health format of yoga that can be delivered in the home. The tele-yoga was co-designed with members of a patient-organisation, yoga-instructor, and IT-technician. It includes live-streamed group-yoga sessions twice a week and an app with instructions on how to self-perform yoga. Aim: To describe a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial (RCT) including a process evaluation and report on a pilot study evaluating method- and intervention-related components including feasibility, safety, and efficacy. Methods: Ten participants with heart failure aged between 41–76 years were randomised to tele-yoga ( n = 5) or to the control group ( n = 5). In the pilot study recruitment, enrolment, randomisation, and data collection of all outcomes including primary, secondary and process evaluation measures were tested according to the study protocol. Fidelity, adherence and acceptability to the tele-yoga group training and app use was determined. Safety was assessed by adverse events. Results: The pilot revealed that the methodological aspect of the protocol worked sufficiently in all aspects except for missing data in the physical test of two participants and one participant in the control-group that dropped out of the study at three months follow-up. The tele-yoga training did not lead to any adverse events or injuries, adherence of tele-yoga was sufficient according to preset limits. The tele-yoga intervention also showed some favourable trends of improvements in the composite-end point compared to the active control group. However, since data only was presented descriptively due to the small sample size, the impact of these trends should be interpreted carefully. Conclusion: Our pilot study showed promising results in feasibility, safety, and acceptability of the tele-yoga intervention. Some changes in the protocol have been made to decrease the risk of missing data in the measures of physical function and in the full-scale RCT now ongoing the results of the sample size calculation for 300 participants have included the estimated level of drop outs and missing data.

Suggested Citation

  • Anna Strömberg & Ingela Thylén & Lotti Orwelius & Leonie Klompstra & Tiny Jaarsma, 2021. "Tele-Yoga in Long Term Illness–Protocol for a Randomised Controlled Trial Including a Process Evaluation and Results from a Pilot Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-13, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:21:p:11343-:d:667133
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/21/11343/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/21/11343/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:21:p:11343-:d:667133. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.