IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i21p11331-d666943.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Representations of Research among Newly Graduated Paramedical Professionals: A Qualitative Study

Author

Listed:
  • Evelyne Decullier

    (Hospices Civils de Lyon, Pôle Santé Publique, Service de Recherche et Epidémiologie Cliniques, F-69003 Lyon, France
    Institut des Sciences et Techniques de la Réadaptation (ISTR), Université Lyon 1, CEDEX 03, F-69373 Lyon, France)

  • Mathilde Chauliaguet

    (Institut des Sciences et Pratiques d’Education et de Formation (ISPEF), Université Lyon 2, F-69007 Lyon, France)

  • Arnaud Siméone

    (Institut des Sciences et Pratiques d’Education et de Formation (ISPEF), Université Lyon 2, F-69007 Lyon, France
    INSERM Unit U1296 Radiation: Defense, Health, Environment, Léon Bérard Center, F-69008 Lyon, France)

  • Julie Haesebaert

    (Hospices Civils de Lyon, Pôle Santé Publique, Service de Recherche et Epidémiologie Cliniques, F-69003 Lyon, France
    Research on Healthcare Performance RESHAPE, INSERM U1290, Université Lyon 1, CEDEX 08, F-69373 Lyon, France)

  • Agnès Witko

    (Institut des Sciences et Techniques de la Réadaptation (ISTR), Université Lyon 1, CEDEX 03, F-69373 Lyon, France
    Dynamique du Langage (DDL), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), UMR 5596, Université Lyon 2, CEDEX 07, F-69363 Lyon, France)

Abstract

Despite a keen interest in clinical research, most paramedical professionals are unwilling to play an active role. Our objective was to explore paramedical professionals’ representations of research. Using an existing database of final year paramedical students (speech therapy, occupational therapy, psychomotricity, audiometry, physiotherapy, orthoptics), we deployed a qualitative approach composed of two successive steps: (1) a free word association task, and (2) semi-structured individual interviews. Out of the 54 students who agreed to be contacted, we received 21 responses to the free word association questionnaire, and 11 interviews were conducted. The hierarchical evocation matrix revealed that the scientific representation of research is based on words defining the research and the purpose of the research. “Collaboration” was identified as being an essential part of the research process. The central core of the representation is coherent with all its components perceived as positive. The content analysis of the interviews showed a polarization around two key points: (1) participants are interested in accessing and using evidence in their practice (2) but feel less confident about and/or motivated to generate evidence themselves. This study highlights the need to develop more research-friendly environments, especially in training institutions.

Suggested Citation

  • Evelyne Decullier & Mathilde Chauliaguet & Arnaud Siméone & Julie Haesebaert & Agnès Witko, 2021. "Representations of Research among Newly Graduated Paramedical Professionals: A Qualitative Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-13, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:21:p:11331-:d:666943
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/21/11331/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/21/11331/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. E. Decullier & H. Maisonneuve & J. N. Besson, 2017. "Publication in 6 rehabilitation professions: a five-year professional-based bibliometric overview," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 113(2), pages 751-764, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:21:p:11331-:d:666943. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.