IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i21p11308-d666522.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Adherence to Oral Contraception in Young Women: Beliefs, Locus of Control, and Psychological Reactance

Author

Listed:
  • Ascensión Fumero

    (Departmento de Psicología Clínica, Psicobiología y Metodología, Facultad de Psicología, Campus de Guajara, Universidad de La Laguna, 38200 San Cristóbal de Tenerife, Spain)

  • Rosario J. Marrero

    (Departmento de Psicología Clínica, Psicobiología y Metodología, Facultad de Psicología, Campus de Guajara, Universidad de La Laguna, 38200 San Cristóbal de Tenerife, Spain)

  • Wenceslao Peñate

    (Departmento de Psicología Clínica, Psicobiología y Metodología, Facultad de Psicología, Campus de Guajara, Universidad de La Laguna, 38200 San Cristóbal de Tenerife, Spain)

  • Juan M. Bethencourt

    (Departmento de Psicología Clínica, Psicobiología y Metodología, Facultad de Psicología, Campus de Guajara, Universidad de La Laguna, 38200 San Cristóbal de Tenerife, Spain)

  • Pedro Barreiro

    (Servicio Canario de la Salud, 38071 San Cristóbal de Tenerife, Spain
    Gabinete Mente y Salud, 38003 San Cristóbal de Tenerife, Spain)

Abstract

Background: There is a high dropout rate of oral contraceptive pills (OCP), mainly due to a lack of adherence to treatment. The aim of this study was to identify the psychological processes and attitudes toward medication involved in adherence to OCP, depending on the prescription, to avoid unintended pregnancies (AUP) or gynecological problems (GP). Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted by asking 689 young women in the fertile period, mean age 23.41 (SD = 5.90), to complete questionnaires related to attitudes, beliefs, psychological reactance, locus of control, and adherence to contraceptive medication. Descriptive analyses and a binary logistic regression were performed. Results: The results confirmed that different beliefs and psychological processes were involved in adherence to oral contraception, based on women’s reasons for taking contraceptive medication. More psychological processes were involved in non-adherence in the AUP group than in the GP group. Psychological reactance contributed most to explaining non-adherence in women who used the OCP to prevent unintended pregnancies. Conversely, women with gynecological problems reported difficulties in adherence, mainly due to their beliefs about contraceptive pills. Conclusions: These findings indicate that attitudes toward medication and psychological processes can play an important role in adherence to OCP, including reasons for using the pill. Identifying the psychological factors and beliefs linked with contraception could guide health professionals to provide counseling to women, thus increasing their adherence to medication and maximizing their health and well-being.

Suggested Citation

  • Ascensión Fumero & Rosario J. Marrero & Wenceslao Peñate & Juan M. Bethencourt & Pedro Barreiro, 2021. "Adherence to Oral Contraception in Young Women: Beliefs, Locus of Control, and Psychological Reactance," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-11, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:21:p:11308-:d:666522
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/21/11308/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/21/11308/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Julia Lowin & James Jarrett & Maria Dimova & Victoria Ignateva & Vitaly Omelyanovsky & Anna Filonenko, 2015. "Direct Costs of Unintended Pregnancy in the Russian Federation," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 61-68, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:21:p:11308-:d:666522. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.