IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i21p11022-d660647.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Restraint Use in Aged Care

Author

Listed:
  • Juanita Breen

    (Wicking Dementia Research and Education Centre, College of Health and Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS 7000, Australia)

  • Barbara C. Wimmer

    (School of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, College of Health and Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS 7000, Australia)

  • Chloé C.H. Smit

    (Wicking Dementia Research and Education Centre, College of Health and Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS 7000, Australia)

  • Helen Courtney-Pratt

    (Wicking Dementia Research and Education Centre, College of Health and Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS 7000, Australia)

  • Katherine Lawler

    (Wicking Dementia Research and Education Centre, College of Health and Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS 7000, Australia)

  • Katharine Salmon

    (Wicking Dementia Research and Education Centre, College of Health and Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS 7000, Australia)

  • Andrea Price

    (Wicking Dementia Research and Education Centre, College of Health and Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS 7000, Australia)

  • Lynette R. Goldberg

    (Wicking Dementia Research and Education Centre, College of Health and Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS 7000, Australia)

Abstract

Restraint use in Australian residential aged care has been highlighted by the media, and investigated by researchers, government and advocacy bodies. In 2018, the Royal Commission into Aged Care selected ‘Restraint’ as a key focus of inquiry. Subsequently, Federal legislation was passed to ensure restraint is only used in residential aged care services as the ‘last resort’. To inform and develop Government educational resources, we conducted qualitative research to gain greater understanding of the experiences and attitudes of aged care stakeholders around restraint practice. Semi-structured interviews were held with 28 participants, comprising nurses, care staff, physicians, physiotherapists, pharmacists and relatives. Two focus groups were also conducted to ascertain the views of residential and community aged care senior management staff. Data were thematically analyzed using a pragmatic approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. Five themes were identified during the study: 1. Understanding of restraint; 2. Support for legislation; 3. Restraint-free environments are not possible; 4. Low-level restraint; 5. Restraint in the community is uncharted. Although most staff, health practitioners and relatives have a basic understanding of restraint, more education is needed at a conceptual level to enable them to identify and avoid restraint practice, particularly ‘low-level’ forms and chemical restraint. There was strong support for the new restraint regulations, but most interviewees admitted they were unsure what the legislation entailed. With regards to resources, stakeholders wanted recognition that there were times when restraint was necessary and advice on what to do in these situations, as opposed to unrealistic aspirations for restraint-free care. Stakeholders reported greater oversight of restraint in residential aged care but specified that community restraint use was largely unknown. Research is needed to investigate the extent and types of restraint practice in community aged care.

Suggested Citation

  • Juanita Breen & Barbara C. Wimmer & Chloé C.H. Smit & Helen Courtney-Pratt & Katherine Lawler & Katharine Salmon & Andrea Price & Lynette R. Goldberg, 2021. "Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Restraint Use in Aged Care," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-15, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:21:p:11022-:d:660647
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/21/11022/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/21/11022/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lauren M. Robins & Den-Ching A. Lee & J Simon Bell & Velandai Srikanth & Ralph Möhler & Keith D. Hill & Terry P. Haines, 2021. "Definition and Measurement of Physical and Chemical Restraint in Long-Term Care: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-20, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:21:p:11022-:d:660647. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.