IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i20p10727-d655131.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Investigating Caesarean Section Practice among Teenage Romanian Mothers Using Modified Robson Ten Group Classification System

Author

Listed:
  • Alexandra Matei

    (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Doctoral School, 020021 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Mihai Cornel Dimitriu

    (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, “Sf. Pantelimon” Emergency Clinical Hospital, 021659 Bucharest, Romania)

  • George Alexandru Roșu

    (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, “Sf. Pantelimon” Emergency Clinical Hospital, 021659 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Cristian George Furău

    (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, “Vasile Goldiș” Western University of Arad, 310025 Arad, Romania)

  • Crîngu Antoniu Ionescu

    (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Doctoral School, 020021 Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

The Robson ten-group classification system is a recognized effective method of assessing caesarean rate. It is based on dividing patients into ten mutually exclusive groups, focusing on six maternal and newborn variables (parity, gestational age, plurality, foetal presentation, previous caesarean, and mode of labour onset). The aim of our analysis was twofold: first, to present the implementation of Robson classification in a pregnant teenage population; and second, to identify the indications for CS in the adolescent population. This study was designed as a one-year prospective analysis and considered all women younger than 20 years of age who delivered in a tertiary care hospital. Before discharge, women who had caesarean delivery responded to a questionnaire regarding their education, prenatal surveillance, and obstetrical history. Caesarean sections accounted for 47.01% of all births. A proportion of 24.57% of the participants had at least one previous caesarean section. Group 10 (all women with a single cephalic preterm pregnancy) was second most often identified among women in middle adolescence (14.03%); 32.20% of the participants in late adolescence were in group 5 (multiparas with a scarred uterus, single cephalic term pregnancy). Differences between the two age groups were not statistically different ( p = 0.96). Abnormal cardiotocographic findings (38.23%), the arrest of descent (19.11%) and arrest of dilation (19.11%), were the most frequent indications for caesareans in Robson group 1. Neonates from mothers in Robson groups 8 (women with a multiple pregnancy) and 7 (multiparas single breech pregnancy) had the most unfavourable outcomes regarding gestational age at delivery and admission to the intensive care unit. We concluded that future focus on obstetrical management is mandatory in Robson groups 7 and 8. Adolescents in Robson group 1 (nulliparas, single cephalic term pregnancy, spontaneous labour) are the primary beneficiaries of strategies to reduce caesarean sections rates.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexandra Matei & Mihai Cornel Dimitriu & George Alexandru Roșu & Cristian George Furău & Crîngu Antoniu Ionescu, 2021. "Investigating Caesarean Section Practice among Teenage Romanian Mothers Using Modified Robson Ten Group Classification System," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(20), pages 1-13, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:20:p:10727-:d:655131
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/20/10727/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/20/10727/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:20:p:10727-:d:655131. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.