IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i20p10630-d653391.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Empirical Investigation of the Verbal Cues Involved in Delivering Experiential Metaphors

Author

Listed:
  • Eduar S. Ramírez

    (Department of Psychology, Fundación Universitaria Konrad Lorenz, Bogotá 110231, Colombia)

  • Francisco J. Ruiz

    (Department of Psychology, Fundación Universitaria Konrad Lorenz, Bogotá 110231, Colombia)

  • Andrés Peña-Vargas

    (Department of Psychology, Fundación Universitaria Konrad Lorenz, Bogotá 110231, Colombia)

  • Paola A. Bernal

    (Department of Psychology, Fundación Universitaria Konrad Lorenz, Bogotá 110231, Colombia)

Abstract

Delivering metaphors experientially has been emphasized in several psychotherapies, such as acceptance and commitment therapy. However, few research has analyzed the variables involved in the efficacy of metaphors. This experimental analog study aims to advance in this topic by analyzing the effect of two components involved in the experiential delivery of metaphors in psychotherapy. The first component is presenting the metaphor by asking the individual to imagine herself as the protagonist of the story versus presenting the metaphor in the third person (Self vs. Other). The second component is the inclusion of verbal cues prompting the relational elaboration of the rules derived from the metaphor content versus not including these prompts (Elaboration vs. No Elaboration). The effect of these components was tested in a double-blind, randomized, 2 × 2 factorial experiment that used the cold pressor task (CPT). Eighty-four participants were exposed to the CPT at the pretest. Afterward, participants were randomly assigned to four experimental protocols. The protocols were audiotaped and consisted of the same metaphor presented in four slightly different ways. Specifically, the protocol of Condition A involved a metaphor with Self and Elaboration, Condition B involved Self and No Elaboration, Condition C involved Other and Elaboration, and Condition D involved Other and No Elaboration. Then, participants were re-exposed to the CPT in the posttest. We hypothesized that Condition A (Self and Elaboration) would show a higher mean increase in pain tolerance than the remaining conditions, which would show similar results. The results were consistent with this hypothesis because Condition A showed a higher percentual increase in pain tolerance (Condition A: M = 268.21, SD = 167.47; Condition B: M = 180.86, SD = 73.01; Condition C: M = 204.81, SD = 100.19; Condition D: M = 175.41, SD = 76.00). A Bayesian informative hypothesis evaluation showed that this hypothesis obtained the highest posterior model probability. Thus, the results indicate that introducing metaphors by asking the individual to imagine herself as the protagonist of the story and providing prompts for relational elaboration might increase the therapeutic effect of the metaphor.

Suggested Citation

  • Eduar S. Ramírez & Francisco J. Ruiz & Andrés Peña-Vargas & Paola A. Bernal, 2021. "Empirical Investigation of the Verbal Cues Involved in Delivering Experiential Metaphors," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(20), pages 1-14, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:20:p:10630-:d:653391
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/20/10630/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/20/10630/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:20:p:10630-:d:653391. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.