IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i20p10564-d652466.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Clinical Concept Extraction with Lexical Semantics to Support Automatic Annotation

Author

Listed:
  • Asim Abbas

    (Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Global Campus, Kyung Hee University, 1732 Deogyeong-daero, Giheung-gu, Yongin-si 17104, Korea
    These authors contributed equally.)

  • Muhammad Afzal

    (Department of Software, Sejong University, Sejong 30019, Korea
    These authors contributed equally.)

  • Jamil Hussain

    (Department of Data Science, Sejong University, Sejong 30019, Korea)

  • Taqdir Ali

    (Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Global Campus, Kyung Hee University, 1732 Deogyeong-daero, Giheung-gu, Yongin-si 17104, Korea)

  • Hafiz Syed Muhammad Bilal

    (Department of Computing, SEECS, NUST University, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan)

  • Sungyoung Lee

    (Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Global Campus, Kyung Hee University, 1732 Deogyeong-daero, Giheung-gu, Yongin-si 17104, Korea)

  • Seokhee Jeon

    (Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Global Campus, Kyung Hee University, 1732 Deogyeong-daero, Giheung-gu, Yongin-si 17104, Korea)

Abstract

Extracting clinical concepts, such as problems, diagnosis, and treatment, from unstructured clinical narrative documents enables data-driven approaches such as machine and deep learning to support advanced applications such as clinical decision-support systems, the assessment of disease progression, and the intelligent analysis of treatment efficacy. Various tools such as cTAKES, Sophia, MetaMap, and other rules-based approaches and algorithms have been used for automatic concept extraction. Recently, machine- and deep-learning approaches have been used to extract, classify, and accurately annotate terms and phrases. However, the requirement of an annotated dataset, which is labor-intensive, impedes the success of data-driven approaches. A rule-based mechanism could support the process of annotation, but existing rule-based approaches fail to adequately capture contextual, syntactic, and semantic patterns. This study intends to introduce a comprehensive rule-based system that automatically extracts clinical concepts from unstructured narratives with higher accuracy and transparency. The proposed system is a pipelined approach, capable of recognizing clinical concepts of three types, problem, treatment, and test, in the dataset collected from a published repository as a part of the I2b2 challenge 2010. The system’s performance is compared with that of three existing systems: Quick UMLS, BIO-CRF, and the Rules (i2b2) model. Compared to the baseline systems, the average F1-score of 72.94% was found to be 13% better than Quick UMLS, 3% better than BIO CRF, and 30.1% better than the Rules (i2b2) model. Individually, the system performance was noticeably higher for problem-related concepts, with an F1-score of 80.45%, followed by treatment-related concepts and test-related concepts, with F1-scores of 76.06% and 55.3%, respectively. The proposed methodology significantly improves the performance of concept extraction from unstructured clinical narratives by exploiting the linguistic and lexical semantic features. The approach can ease the automatic annotation process of clinical data, which ultimately improves the performance of supervised data-driven applications trained with these data.

Suggested Citation

  • Asim Abbas & Muhammad Afzal & Jamil Hussain & Taqdir Ali & Hafiz Syed Muhammad Bilal & Sungyoung Lee & Seokhee Jeon, 2021. "Clinical Concept Extraction with Lexical Semantics to Support Automatic Annotation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(20), pages 1-24, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:20:p:10564-:d:652466
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/20/10564/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/20/10564/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:20:p:10564-:d:652466. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.