IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i19p10388-d648789.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

CoCoss-Trial: Concurrent Comparison of Self-Sampling Devices for HPV-Detection

Author

Listed:
  • Faruk Cem Ertik

    (Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany
    Shared first authorship.)

  • Johanna Kampers

    (Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany
    Shared first authorship.)

  • Fabienne Hülse

    (Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany)

  • Claudia Stolte

    (IZD Hannover, 30159 Hannover, Germany)

  • Gerd Böhmer

    (IZD Hannover, 30159 Hannover, Germany)

  • Peter Hillemanns

    (Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany)

  • Matthias Jentschke

    (Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany)

Abstract

High-risk human papillomavirus (hr-HPV) infection of the cervicovaginal tract is known to be the major cause of cervical cancer. Similar to various other countries, Germany introduced an organized combined screening including cytology and HPV testing in 2020. The participation rate was around 70% in the past. Self-testing for hr-HPV infections could be an option to increase the participation rate. Two dry vaginal self-sampling devices and a device for the self-collection of first-void urine were evaluated in combination with a PCR-based hr-HPV test regarding their clinical performance (sensitivity for high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, CIN 2+). A cervical smear taken by a clinician during colposcopy was used as reference. This open prospective multicenter trial recruited patients referred to the two participating colposcopy clinics (Hannover Medical School and IZD Hannover, Germany) with abnormal results from cervical cancer screening from 05/2020 to 11/2020. All patients received three CE-certified self-sampling devices (FLOQSwabs, COPAN, Italy; Evalyn Brush, Rovers Medical Devices, the Netherlands; Colli-Pee FV-5000, Novosanis, Wijnegem, Belgium) with instructions to read and apply at home in a pre-specified alternating order without medical assistance. HPV testing was performed after adequate preservation and DNA extraction. Histological results from colposcopy or cervical excisional surgery after self-sampling were used as the gold-standard. The data of 65 patients were analyzed. All invasive cancer cases and over 90% of the CIN 3 lesions were found to be hr-HPV positive with all three self-collection devices. All devices were considered easy to use without any difficulties following the written instructions. Hr-HPV testing of self-collected first-void urine and dry vaginal self-samples showed a high sensitivity for CIN 3+ comparable to that of a clinician-taken smear. Self-sampling was well accepted as it is convenient and easy to use.

Suggested Citation

  • Faruk Cem Ertik & Johanna Kampers & Fabienne Hülse & Claudia Stolte & Gerd Böhmer & Peter Hillemanns & Matthias Jentschke, 2021. "CoCoss-Trial: Concurrent Comparison of Self-Sampling Devices for HPV-Detection," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-8, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:19:p:10388-:d:648789
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/19/10388/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/19/10388/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:19:p:10388-:d:648789. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.