IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i19p10324-d647370.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fidelity of a Motivational Interviewing Intervention for Improving Return to Work for People with Musculoskeletal Disorders

Author

Listed:
  • Ida Løchting

    (Research and Communication Unit for Musculoskeletal Health (FORMI), Division of Clinical Neuroscience, Oslo University Hospital, P.O. Box 4956, 0424 Oslo, Norway)

  • Roger Hagen

    (Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1094, 0317 Oslo, Norway
    Department of Psychology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, P.O. Box 8900, 7491 Trondheim, Norway
    Research Institute, Modum Bad, P.O. Box 33, 3370 Vikersund, Norway)

  • Christine K. Monsen

    (Division of Mental Health & Addiction, Vestfold Hospital Trust, P.O. Box 2168, 3103 Tønsberg, Norway)

  • Margreth Grotle

    (Research and Communication Unit for Musculoskeletal Health (FORMI), Division of Clinical Neuroscience, Oslo University Hospital, P.O. Box 4956, 0424 Oslo, Norway
    Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Science, Oslo Metropolitan University, P.O. Box 4, 0130 Oslo, Norway)

  • Kjersti Storheim

    (Research and Communication Unit for Musculoskeletal Health (FORMI), Division of Clinical Neuroscience, Oslo University Hospital, P.O. Box 4956, 0424 Oslo, Norway
    Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Science, Oslo Metropolitan University, P.O. Box 4, 0130 Oslo, Norway)

  • Fiona Aanesen

    (Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Science, Oslo Metropolitan University, P.O. Box 4, 0130 Oslo, Norway)

  • Britt Elin Øiestad

    (Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Science, Oslo Metropolitan University, P.O. Box 4, 0130 Oslo, Norway)

  • Hedda Eik

    (Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Science, Oslo Metropolitan University, P.O. Box 4, 0130 Oslo, Norway)

  • Gunnhild Bagøien

    (Nidelv Community Mental Health Centre, Department of Mental Health, Trondheim University Hospital, P.O. Box 3250, 7006 Trondheim, Norway)

Abstract

The objective of this study was to conduct a fidelity evaluation of a motivational interviewing (MI) intervention delivered by social insurance caseworkers, in a three-arm randomized controlled trial (RCT) for improving return to work for people on sick leave with musculoskeletal disorders. The caseworkers received six days of MI training, including an intervention manual prior to the trial onset, as well as supervision throughout the trial. The caseworkers recorded 21 MI sessions at regular intervals during the trial. An independent MI analysis center scored the recordings using the MI treatment integrity code (MITI 4). In addition, three experienced MI trainers assessed the adherence to the MI intervention manual on a 1–4 Likert scale and MI competence. Total MITI 4 mean scores were at beginning proficiency levels for two components (global technical, mean 3.0; SD 0.6 and the reflections/questions ratio, mean 1.1; SD 0.2) and under beginning proficiency for two components (global relational, mean 3.2; SD 0.7 and complex question, mean 34.0; SD 21.2). The MI trainers’ assessment showed similar results. The mean adherence score for the MI sessions was 2.96 (SD 0.9). Despite delivering a thorough course and supervision package, most of the caseworkers did not reach proficiency levels of good MI competence during the study. The fidelity evaluation showed that a large amount of training, supervision and practice is needed for caseworkers to become competent MI providers. When planning to implement MI, it is important that thorough consideration is given regarding the resources and the time needed to train caseworkers to provide MI in a social insurance setting.

Suggested Citation

  • Ida Løchting & Roger Hagen & Christine K. Monsen & Margreth Grotle & Kjersti Storheim & Fiona Aanesen & Britt Elin Øiestad & Hedda Eik & Gunnhild Bagøien, 2021. "Fidelity of a Motivational Interviewing Intervention for Improving Return to Work for People with Musculoskeletal Disorders," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-11, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:19:p:10324-:d:647370
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/19/10324/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/19/10324/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:19:p:10324-:d:647370. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.